Small business▼−6Since September 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 4 → 10 of 82
1 category · RankedRemitClear
15Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Cash application for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 83 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 88
2%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market8 of 83
6%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In cash application · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named RemitClear for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 6% | 8 of 83 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, RemitClear held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Cash application · by segment
Mid-market▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 18 → 10 of 79
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | 2% | 5% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 8 of 83 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated RemitClear across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated RemitClear across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“RemitClear is the best dedicated cash application tool if you need automated matching and posting into QuickBooks or Xero” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash application · budget prompt · first choice
“RemitClear is frequently recommended for no-ERP small businesses” Muse Glimmer 30B · Cash application · budget prompt · first choice
“1. RemitClear ⭐ Best for Small Businesses Without ERP” Kimi K2 · Cash application · budget prompt · first choice
“platforms like Remitclear offer predictable monthly subscriptions rather than large implementation fees” MiniMax M2.5 · Cash application · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RemitClear, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RemitClear was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RemitClear, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RemitClear was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RemitClear. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named RemitClear and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
remitclear.comYour site15
highradius.com10
bluecopa.com9
chaserhq.com8
lunos.ai8
cashbook.com7
stuut.ai7
cashflowpick.com6
eco.com5
gaviti.com5
Sixty-five of the eighty domain citations in answers naming RemitClear came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
remitclear.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RemitClear takes 6% of first choices and Versapay takes 9%.ShowHide
Search and answers
remitclear.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RemitClear takes 6% of first choices and Versapay takes 9%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “cash application tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cash application software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“remitclear”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 47 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 48 · 1 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 423
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 8 of 83 in cash application
Segment leader
9%
Versapay
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on remitclear.com
76
subdomains included
Content
38
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
15 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 33 | 20 | 2026-09-25 | Cash application, Accounting software | |
| Comparison | 3 | 2 | 2026-07-28 | Cash application | |
| Case study | 2 | 2 | 2026-09-22 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Support at home provider remittances xero blog
- 2026-09-23Remitclear ai accounting software world ranking 2026 blog
- 2026-09-22Connect resources case study
- 2026-09-22Suresafe case study
- 2026-09-19Ndis plan manager remittances xero blog
- 2026-09-16Bulk apply payments quickbooks online spreadsheet blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page remitclear.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as RemitClear
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as RemitClear; a claim can dispute any of them.
Remitclear 1
Follow RemitClear
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
RemitClear is its own company.ShowHide
The company
RemitClear is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automated remittance capture and matching for Xero and QuickBooks Online
- For
- finance teams
- Price stated
- Priced on remittances and invoice lines, not per seat remitclear.com
- Free plan or trial
- 30-day money-back guarantee remitclear.com/pricing
- Certifications
- Xero Certified App
- Hosting
- AustraliaNew Zealandthe United Kingdomthe United StatesCanadaIreland (EU)United StatesEU
- Customers named
- Connect ResourcesAllora OptionsA J PottingerOne Hope Home CareSureSafeXpedite DistributionRose Life CareMow Bros Gardening
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations
What RemitClear's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: remitclear.com, remitclear.com/pricing, remitclear.com/security, remitclear.com/solutions/xero-batch-payments, remitclear.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RemitClear's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RemitClear, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RemitClear by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where RemitClear is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name RemitClear, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.