Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 32 → 42 of 116
2 categories · Named, not rankedMindsprint SprintAP
14Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mindsprint SprintAP was named 6 times in Global e-invoicing compl and 1 other category, where Avalara E-Invoicing led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market37 of 136
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise21 of 90
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Mindsprint SprintAP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 37 of 136 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts payable automation | Spend and procurement | 0% | 43 of 54 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Mindsprint SprintAP held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Global e-invoicing compl · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 23 → 25 of 87
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 37 of 136 |
| Accounts payable automat | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 43 of 54, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Mindsprint SprintAP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Mindsprint SprintAP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mindsprint SprintAP, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mindsprint SprintAP was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mindsprint SprintAP, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mindsprint SprintAP was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mindsprint SprintAP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Mindsprint SprintAP and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mindsprint.comYour site14
highradius.com10
tungstenautomation.com5
g2.com4
medium.com4
medius.com4
thedigitalprojectmanager.com4
worldmetrics.org4
cleartax.com3
corpay.com3
Forty-one of the fifty-five domain citations in answers naming Mindsprint SprintAP came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mindsprint.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mindsprint SprintAP takes 0% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
mindsprint.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mindsprint SprintAP takes 0% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “e-invoicing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “e-invoicing compliance platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“mindsprint sprintap”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 154 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 146 · 1 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 726
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 37 of 136 in global e-invoicing compl
Segment leader
25%
Avalara E-Invoicing
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mindsprint.com
212
subdomains included
Content
121
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
5 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 78 | 29 | 2026-09-21 | Procure-to-pay, Invoicing software | |
| Conference or event | 33 | 11 | 2026-11-30 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 2 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2024-12-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2024-10-09 |
Most recent
- 2026-11-30Aws reinvent conference or event
- 2026-10-18Hlth usa 2026 conference or event
- 2026-10-15Conduent elevate conference or event
- 2026-10-13Gitex global conference or event
- 2026-09-22Planview connect 2026 conference or event
- 2026-09-21Food manufacturing inventory management software blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mindsprint.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Mindsprint SprintAP
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mindsprint SprintAP; a claim can dispute any of them.
Sprint AP by Mindsprint 1
Follow Mindsprint SprintAP
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mindsprint SprintAP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mindsprint SprintAP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mindsprint SprintAP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Mindsprint SprintAP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mindsprint SprintAP, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.