AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Medius · October 2026 Edition
4 categories · Ranked

Medius

98Judge labels
7First choices
2Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Accounts payable automat for enterprise buyers
Rank 7 of 54 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 23 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Medius →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 63
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market7 of 54
3%23 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise6 of 72
5%29 labels
accepted challenger
In accounts payable automat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Medius for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Accounts payable automationSpend and procurement3%7 of 540%23accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Business bill payTreasury and cash0%22 of 980%6under 10 labels · led by BILL at 32%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Global e-invoicing complianceTax and compliance0%36 of 1360%5under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
B2B payment acceptanceReceivables and billing0%57 of 940%1under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Medius held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Accounts payable automat · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 43 → 8 of 61
Mid-market▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 6 of 50
Enterprise▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 5 → 6 of 60

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Accounts payable automat5%4%▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 7 of 54, unchanged
Business bill pay0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 22 of 98, unchanged
Global e-invoicing compl0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 42 → 36 of 136
B2B payment acceptance0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 57 of 94, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Medius across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501203
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash01304
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small20103
DeepSeek V4 Flash01203
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K201203
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.510102
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B03306

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct23 labels2
Paraphrase9 labels1
Comparative42 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels2
Scale-constrained11 labels2
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative98 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Tipalti and Medius are top contenders due to their scalability, global capabilities, and advanced automation.” Mistral Small · Accounts payable automat · direct prompt · first choice
“Medius stands out for multinational companies needing compliance with country-specific mandates” MiniMax M2.5 · Accounts payable automat · comparative prompt · first choice
“Chaser and Medius are top choices due to their focus on mid-market needs” Mistral Small · Accounts payable automat · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Medius is an accounts payable platform ideal for mid-market to large organizations seeking fast implementation” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Accounts payable automat · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Medius, over the 98 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Medius was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Tipalti81 of 9816Compare →
Coupa65 of 986Not among the top eight
AvidXchange49 of 985Compare →
Stampli49 of 985Compare →
Basware44 of 9810Not among the top eight
Ramp44 of 983Compare →
BILL Accounts Payable35 of 984Compare →
HighRadius29 of 982Not among the top eight
SAP Concur28 of 981Not among the top eight
SAP Ariba22 of 981Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Medius. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 98 of the 98 answers that named Medius and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

medius.comYour site68
g2.com47
highradius.com41
ramp.com35
corpay.com33
mindsprint.com29
tipalti.com25
bill.com24
rillion.com23
stampli.com23

280 of the 348 domain citations in answers naming Medius came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

medius.com/blog/top-ap-automation-software-compared-features-fit-and-tradeoffs54
g2.com/categories/ap-automation32
corpay.com/resources/blog/best-ap-automation-software27
ramp.com/blog/accounts-payable/best-accounts-payable-automation-software20
zoneandco.com/articles/top-ap-automation-software-solutions18
zip.com/blog/ap-automation-software17
mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/e-invoicing-software14
learn.g2.com/best-accounts-payable-automation-software13

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

medius.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Medius takes 3% of first choices and Ramp takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ap automation tools”
5
Position for “accounts payable automation software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,900 a month (“medius”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,183 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 43,385 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,472 · 516 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,124
Paid Google search
3 searches its ads show for, about 41 clicks and $6,291 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
83 ads · 59 text, 20 image, 4 video · 30 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2024, as MEDIUS SOFTWARE INC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 32 in the year, 51 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
3%
rank 7 of 54 in accounts payable automat
Segment leader
22%
Ramp
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
98 answers
Its own site cited
in 98 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on medius.com
2,616
subdomains included
Content
1,362
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
65 · 67
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog704362026-09-28Accounts payable automat, Expense management
Webinar or virtual event318undatedProcure-to-pay, Expense management
Case study148undated
Glossary or explainer6902026-06-24Expense management, Accounts payable automat
Podcast or video68undatedAccounts payable automat, Expense management
Comparison4012026-07-22Expense management
Conference or event712026-08-10
Template or tool602026-06-04
Report or ebook1undated
News or press1undated

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on medius.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page medius.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Medius

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Medius; a claim can dispute any of them.
Basware/Medius 2Medius / Coupa 1

Follow Medius

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Medius is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AP Automation & Global Payment Software
medius.com
For
midsize and enterprise finance teams
medius.com
Price stated
Medius offers two AP Automation packages ... contact us for your custom quote. medius.com/pricing
Integrations claimed
100 medius.com/solutions
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 2SOC 1 Type 2SOC 3ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 9001:2015JOSCAR
Customers named
Karl LagerfeldPumaNissanLush Fresh Handmade CosmeticsU-HaulViking LineCineplexR.M. Williams
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What Medius's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: medius.com, medius.com/pricing, trust.medius.com, medius.com/solutions, medius.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Medius's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Medius, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Medius by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Medius is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Medius, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at medius.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.