Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 58 of 77, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedNetgain
2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Netgain was named 2 times in Account reconciliation and 1 other category, where FloQast led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market65 of 82
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In account reconciliation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Netgain for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 0% | 65 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 0% | 50 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Netgain held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Account reconciliation · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Account reconciliation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 65 of 82, unchanged |
| AI accounting assistants | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 50 of 85 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Netgain across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Netgain across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“teams on NetSuite may prefer Netgain” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI accounting assistants · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Netgain, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Netgain was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Netgain, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Netgain was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Netgain. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Netgain and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
numeric.io2
aibuzz.blog1
airwallex.com1
dualentry.com1
g2.com1
hevodata.com1
highradius.com1
intuit.com1
klippa.com1
kognitos.com1
Eleven of the eleven domain citations in answers naming Netgain came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on netgain.tech
780
subdomains included
Content
477
counted in the table below
Documentation
20
Product · Integration
3 · 22
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 188 | undated | Lease accounting, Accounting software | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 93 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 84 | 0 | 2026-06-18 | ||
| Template or tool | 31 | undated | Accounting software, Fixed asset accounting | ||
| News or press | 22 | undated | Accounting software, Fixed asset accounting | ||
| Comparison | 20 | undated | Accounting software | ||
| Case study | 17 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 16 | 2 | 2026-07-02 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-07-02How to connect netcash to the netsuite ai connector service podcast or video
- 2026-07-02How to connect netclose to the netsuite ai connector service podcast or video
- 2026-06-18Accounting summit conference or event
- 2026-04-03Netclose a faster way to manage your month end podcast or video
- 2026-03-31Automate the period close using netclose podcast or video
- 2026-03-31How to prevent gl errors in netsuite podcast or video
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page netgain.tech exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name lease accounting (23); 2 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Netgain
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Netgain; a claim can dispute any of them.
Netgain / Netclose 1
Follow Netgain
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Netgain is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Netgain is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI accounting software. Built directly in NetSuite.
- For
- controllers and accounting teams
- Price stated
- Request a Quote netgain.tech/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- We provide interactive click-through demos that let you explore the product at your own pace. netgain.tech/pricing
- Certifications
- Assurance Through bi-annual SOC reportsSOC certificationSOC 1 Type 2 ReportSOC 2 Type 2 Report
- Customers named
- SignifydPuraCreate RoomMariani Premier GroupRachio
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What Netgain's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: netgain.tech, netgain.tech/pricing, netgain.tech/use-case/loan-management, netgain.tech/customers, netgain.tech/tools/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Netgain's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Netgain, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Netgain by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Netgain is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Netgain, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.