Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 63 → 78 of 109
2 categories · Named, not rankedNilus
4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Nilus was named 3 times in Treasury management syst and 1 other category, where Trovata led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business82 of 117
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market47 of 124
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Nilus for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 0% | 47 of 124 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 48 of 101 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Nilus held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Treasury management syst · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 29 → 40 of 116
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 47 of 124 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 48 of 101, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Nilus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Nilus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Nilus if your forecasting is heavily driven by accounts receivable” Perplexity Sonar · Treasury management syst · direct prompt · alternative
“Nilus is an AI-native treasury platform that automates daily cash positioning” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Nilus, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nilus was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Nilus, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nilus was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nilus. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Nilus and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
centime.com4
nilus.comYour site4
debtbook.com3
gartner.com3
treasury.ripple.com3
agicap.com2
checkthat.ai2
concourse.ai2
erpresearch.com2
financecopilothq.com2
Twenty-three of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Nilus came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on nilus.com
171
subdomains included
Content
143
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 85 | undated | Cash flow forecasting, Treasury management syst | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 37 | undated | Treasury management syst, Cash flow forecasting | ||
| Case study | 10 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page nilus.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Nilus
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Nilus is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Nilus is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Agentic treasury platform: an AI workforce that reconciles cash, forecasts liquidity, governs payments, and monitors debt covenants across every bank and ERP.
- For
- finance teams
- Integrations claimed
- 20000 nilus.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IISOC 1GDPRSSO + SAML
- Customers named
- TaboolaStackAdaptAlloyPlanned ParenthoodFlow Control GroupVaronisWizFlare
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Nilus's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: nilus.com, nilus.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nilus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nilus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Nilus by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Nilus is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Nilus, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.