| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 22% | 2 of 73 | 5% | 21 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 19% → 23%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 2% | 16 of 111 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounting software | Accounting and close | 0% | 15 of 55 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 44% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 53 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Fixed asset accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 49 of 107 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 34% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Professional services automation | Receivables and billing | 0% | 61 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BigTime at 29% | |
| Rebate management | Receivables and billing | 0% | 67 of 80 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Enable at 52% | |
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 0% | 96 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | 19% | 23% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 19% → 23%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 73, unchanged |
| Supplier management | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 16 of 111 |
| Accounting software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 15 of 55 |
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 53 of 105, unchanged |
| Fixed asset accounting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 49 of 107, unchanged |
| PSA | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 99, unchanged |
| Rebate management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 67 of 80, unchanged |
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 96 of 124, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Odoo: Known for its modular approach, allowing you to start with just the features you need and scale as you grow... low total cost of ownership.” Mistral Small · ERP systems · budget prompt · first choice
“The Best Overall Value: Odoo ... Go with Odoo Enterprise if you want the absolute lowest monthly cost for the most features.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ERP systems · budget prompt · first choice
“Odoo - a popular and highly-rated ERP system that offers a range of features and pricing plans, including a free version.” Llama 4 Maverick · ERP systems · budget prompt · first choice
“If you can afford a modest subscription and want fast deployment with minimal IT, Odoo is the most cited best value.” Muse Glimmer 30B · ERP systems · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Odoo, Microsoft Dynamics 365, and other broad business platforms when rebate management is only one part of a larger workflow” Perplexity Sonar · Rebate management · negative prompt · soft negative
“No Dedicated IT Staff | Self-hosted (On-Premise) solutions like Odoo (Community), Apache OFBiz” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ERP systems · negative prompt · soft negative
“Very expensive, require professional implementation partners, and are highly complex.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounting software · comparative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 105 of the 120 answers that named Odoo and are not a share of its labels.
329 of the 329 domain citations in answers naming Odoo came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conference or event | 52,858 | 9 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Blog | 1,979 | 64 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Case study | 366 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 16 | 0 | 2025-02-07 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 15 | 3 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| News or press | 9 | 0 | 2022-11-14 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 2 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2026-06-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Every page odoo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Odoo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: odoo.com, odoo.com/pricing, trust.odoo.com, odoo.com/customers, odoo.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Odoo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Odoo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Odoo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Odoo is among the products AI models recommend first in ERP systems this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.