Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 8 → 6 of 51
4 categories · RankedAcumatica
143Judge labels
12First choices
10Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Accounting software for enterprise buyers
Rank 11 of 73 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 43 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Acumatica →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 56
4%45 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market11 of 73
0%43 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise9 of 47
2%13 labels
criticized challenger
In erp systems · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Acumatica for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 0% | 11 of 73 | 0% | 43 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounting software | Accounting and close | 0% | 9 of 55 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 30 of 105 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 0% | 30 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Acumatica held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · ERP systems · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 6 → 11 of 63
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 6 → 37 of 41
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 11 of 73 |
| Financial reporting | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 30 of 105 |
| Accounting software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 9 of 55 |
| Account reconciliation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 30 of 82, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Acumatica across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Acumatica across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct37 labels1
Paraphrase19 labelsNone
Comparative31 labelsNone
Budget-constrained23 labels10
Scale-constrained15 labels1
Negative18 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative143 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“a Mid-Market cloud ERP (like NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Acumatica, Infor, Sage X3) would serve you better” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ERP systems · scale prompt · alternative
“Best for: B2B distribution, manufacturing, and wholesale companies needing tight inventory-to-financials integration.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Accounting software · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Product-centric B2B (manufacturing/distribution) | Unlimited users, strong inventory/CRM integration” Grok 4.1 Fast · Accounting software · direct prompt · alternative
“Acumatica (Rising Contender) Best for: Growing B2B companies wanting flexible, user-based pricing.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ERP systems · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Acumatica, over the 143 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acumatica was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Acumatica, over the 143 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acumatica was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Acumatica. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 132 of the 143 answers that named Acumatica and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
erpresearch.com96
randgroup.com56
erp-pilot.com37
forbes.com34
netsuite.com32
learn.g2.com29
g2.com26
cin7.com24
ramp.com24
softwareconnect.com23
381 of the 381 domain citations in answers naming Acumatica came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
acumatica.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Acumatica takes 0% of first choices and Oracle NetSuite takes 39%.ShowHide
Search and answers
acumatica.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Acumatica takes 0% of first choices and Oracle NetSuite takes 39%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “erp system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “erp systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 12,100 a month (“acumatica”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 242 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 130,487 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,987 · 584 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,146
- Paid Google search
- 9 searches its ads show for, about 91 clicks and $2,934 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 11 of 73 in ERP systems
Segment leader
39%
Oracle NetSuite
- First choices
- 12 across its categories
- Named in
- 143 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 132 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on acumatica.com
2,137
subdomains included
Content
1,368
counted in the table below
Documentation
9
Product · Integration
1 · 12
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 873 | 20 | 2026-09-21 | ERP systems, Accounting software | |
| Case study | 145 | 2 | 2026-09-27 | ERP systems | |
| News or press | 120 | undated | Accounting software, Expense management | ||
| Conference or event | 102 | 0 | 2026-05-28 | ||
| Comparison | 50 | 2 | 2026-09-08 | ERP systems, Procure-to-pay | |
| Report or ebook | 27 | 1 | 2026-08-31 | ERP systems | |
| Podcast or video | 19 | 2 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 16 | 1 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Template or tool | 13 | 0 | 2026-05-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2024-01-12 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-27Cw home depot case study
- 2026-09-21Sheoga hardwood flooring takes their business next level blog
- 2026-09-1710 questions to ask when evaluating ai erp blog
- 2026-09-17Oracle layoffs priorities concern small midsized businesses blog
- 2026-09-16Business events automating processes driving efficiency blog
- 2026-09-15Planning to live lessons successful erp implementation blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- March 3, 2026 to March 7, 2026CONEXPO-CON/AGG 2026Las Vegas, United States · exhibited
As the event pages on acumatica.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page acumatica.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Acumatica
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Acumatica; a claim can dispute any of them.
Acumatica Cloud ERP 3
Follow Acumatica
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Acumatica is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Acumatica is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Acumatica ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system delivers adaptable cloud and mobile technology with a unique, all-inclusive user licensing model.
- For
- mid-sized customers
- Price stated
- transparent pricing acumatica.com
- Certifications
- SOC 1/2/3GDPRFDAPIPEDACCPACPRA
- Hosting
- Amazon Web ServicesAWSUSCanadaUK
- Customers named
- Saddleback LeatherWine Racks AmericaVenture EngineeringEastman Music CompanySpohn AssociatesFabuwoodDigital PlanetIncubeta
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What Acumatica's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: acumatica.com, acumatica.com/pricing, acumatica.com/cloud-erp-software/security, acumatica.com/platform-privacy-statement, acumatica.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Acumatica's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Acumatica, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Acumatica by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Acumatica is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Acumatica, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.