| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 2% | 7 of 73 | 21% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounting software | Accounting and close | 0% | 25 of 55 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 44% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 36 of 111 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 77 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 7 of 73 |
| Accounting software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 45 → 25 of 55 |
| Supplier management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 36 of 111, unchanged |
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 77 of 105, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“NetSuite and SAP Business One are the most popular and highly rated” Mistral Small · ERP systems · direct prompt · first choice
“If you already run SAP Business One, its SRM module can be a low-friction choice.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Supplier management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Growing companies needing enterprise-level features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ERP systems · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for All-in-One ERP Integration” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Supplier management · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Small / Startup (<$10M Revenue) | SAP Business One, Oracle NetSuite, Microsoft AX” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ERP systems · negative prompt · soft negative
“Southeast Power Group lawsuit: 4-year failed implementation, $2M+ damages” Kimi K2 · ERP systems · negative prompt · soft negative
“generally pricier” Perplexity Sonar · ERP systems · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 68 of the 75 answers that named SAP Business One and are not a share of its labels.
250 of the 250 domain citations in answers naming SAP Business One came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 1,797 | 92 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Blog | 677 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 183 | 0 | 2023-08-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 146 | 0 | 2026-05-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 98 | 0 | 2025-04-01 | ||
| Case study | 29 | 0 | 2023-10-01 | ||
| Comparison | 21 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 13 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-24 |
As the event pages on sap.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page sap.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What SAP Business One's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sap.com, sap.com/about/trust-center/security/cloud-erp-security.html, sap.com/products/a-z.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Business One's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Business One, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP Business One by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: