Finance AI Index

Index › Products › Oracle GRC · October 2026 Edition

Oracle · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Oracle GRC

8Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle GRC was named 1 time in Internal controls, where FloQast led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business107 of 111

under the label threshold

Mid-market54 of 90

under the label threshold

Enterprise30 of 64

under the label threshold

In internal controls · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oracle GRC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Internal controls and SOX	Tax and compliance	0%	54 of 90	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 25%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Oracle GRC held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Internal controls · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 111 → 103 of 107

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 29 → 54 of 88

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 19 → 27 of 58

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Internal controls	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 29 → 54 of 90

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Oracle GRC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Large enterprises needing comprehensive control lifecycle management” Kimi K2 · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle GRC, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle GRC was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workiva7 of 80Not among the top eight

AuditBoard6 of 82Not among the top eight

LogicGate Risk Cloud4 of 81Not among the top eight

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management4 of 81Not among the top eight

SAP GRC4 of 80Not among the top eight

Hyperproof3 of 81Not among the top eight

MetricStream3 of 80Not among the top eight

Onspring3 of 80Not among the top eight

QuickBooks2 of 82Not among the top eight

FloQast2 of 81Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle GRC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Oracle GRC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gitnux.org4

gartner.com3

itechguides.com3

metricstream.com3

supervizor.com3

v-comply.com3

complianceofficer.ai2

complies.ai2

erpresearch.com2

finance-ai-index.com2

Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Oracle GRC came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-controls-software3

gitnux.org/best/internal-control-software3

supervizor.com/blog/grc/internal-control/software3

erpresearch.com/erp-add-ons/sox-controls2

finance-ai-index.com/tax/internal-controls-and-sox/smb2

g2.com/categories/audit-management2

guzmangray.com/internal-controls-small-businesses2

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-sox-compliance-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Oracle GRC stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 90 a month (“oracle grc”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 8 a month
Its own site: It sits on Oracle's site (oracle.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 54 of 90 in internal controls

Segment leader

25%

FloQast

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 8 answers
Its own site cited: in 8 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Oracle GRC

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Oracle is the company behind Oracle GRC.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Oracle: Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Oracle Analytics, Oracle BPM, Oracle Banking Digital Experience, Oracle Cash Management, Oracle Channel Revenue Management, Oracle Cloud EPM Planning, Oracle Cloud ERP and 44 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: a leading AI-driven solution for enhancing financial controls, automating audit processes, and improving cybersecurity measures
oracle.com/erp/risk-management-and-compliance
For: complex global organizations
oracle.com/erp/risk-management-and-compliance
Customers named: MetaChipotleHoulihan LokeyFanaticsTTX
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Oracle GRC's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: oracle.com/erp/risk-management-and-compliance, oracle.com/apac/erp/risk-management-and-compliance, oracle.com/asean/erp/risk-management-and-compliance, oracle.com/latam/erp/risk-management-and-compliance, oracle.com/africa/erp/risk-management-and-compliance. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle GRC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle GRC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle GRC by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Oracle GRC is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle GRC, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.