Every category where a model named Oracle Hyperion for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	98 of 99	90%	10	criticized challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	102 of 102	88%	8	under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	73 of 74	80%	5	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 20%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Financial modeling and scenario planning	Planning and analysis	0%	75 of 77	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Excel at 14%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Oracle Hyperion held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Corporate performance ma · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 82 → 97 of 101

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 94 → 89 of 91

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 65 → 69 of 69

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Corporate performance ma	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 94 → 98 of 99
Financial consolidation	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 93 → 102 of 102
FP&A platforms	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 49 → 73 of 74
Financial modeling	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 78 → 75 of 77

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Oracle Hyperion across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	7	7
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	2	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	5	6
Kimi K2	0	0	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	2	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained16 labelsNone

Negative32 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative72 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Better fit: Enterprise suites like Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, or Workiva” Qwen 3.7 Flash · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to avoid for a true mid-market B2B profile: ... Oracle's CPM software may not be suited for small and medium-sized businesses.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Corporate performance ma · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“outdated tools like Hyperion slow close cycles, erode trust in financial data, and limit strategic decision-making” Muse Glimmer 30B · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · hard negative

“These are legacy platforms being displaced by cloud-native solutions. New implementations rarely recommended.” Kimi K2 · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · hard negative

“you generally want to avoid the massive legacy players (like Oracle Hyperion, which is too expensive/rigid)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial consolidation · scale prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Hyperion, over the 71 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Hyperion was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Anaplan41 of 712Not among the top eight

Workday Adaptive Planning35 of 716Not among the top eight

OneStream35 of 712Not among the top eight

SAP BPC31 of 710Not among the top eight

Vena27 of 712Not among the top eight

Datarails24 of 712Not among the top eight

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM24 of 710Not among the top eight

Prophix22 of 711Not among the top eight

Cube19 of 712Not among the top eight

Planful18 of 711Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Hyperion. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 71 answers that named Oracle Hyperion and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

prophix.com23

g2.com20

drivetrain.ai17

linkedin.com14

cubesoftware.com13

learn.g2.com13

reddit.com13

getaleph.com12

softwaresuggest.com12

onestream.com11

148 of the 148 domain citations in answers naming Oracle Hyperion came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

prophix.com/blog/the-12-best-financial-consolidation-software-tools-for-fp-a-teams13

drivetrain.ai/solutions/enterprise-performance-management-software9

learn.g2.com/best-fpa-software9

clockwork.ai/blog/best-fpa-software-small-business8

consolidate.io/blog/financial-consolidation-software-comparison8

softwaresuggest.com/enterprise-performance-management-software8

getaleph.com/answers/top-fpa-software-20266

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-financial-consolidation-vendors6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Oracle Hyperion stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 720 a month (“oracle hyperion”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 110 a month
Its own site: It sits on Oracle's site (oracle.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 98 of 99 in corporate performance ma

Segment leader

22%

Planful

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 71 answers
Its own site cited: in 56 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Oracle Hyperion

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Hyperion; a claim can dispute any of them.

Hyperion 2Oracle EPM Cloud / Oracle Hyperion 1Oracle Hyperion (HFM / FCCS) 1Oracle Hyperion (On-Premise Suite) 1Oracle Hyperion (On-Premises) 1Oracle Hyperion / HFM / Essbase (On-Premises) 1Oracle Hyperion/HFM 1

Follow Oracle Hyperion

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Oracle is the company behind Oracle Hyperion.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Oracle: Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Oracle Analytics, Oracle BPM, Oracle Banking Digital Experience, Oracle Cash Management, Oracle Channel Revenue Management, Oracle Cloud EPM Planning, Oracle Cloud ERP and 44 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: a centralized planning, budgeting, and forecasting solution that integrates financial and operational planning processes and improves business predictability.
oracle.com/performance-management/hyperion-planning
Hosting: Oracle Cloudon premisesa third-party data centerany combination
Not stated on the pages read: Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, customers

What Oracle Hyperion's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: oracle.com/performance-management/hyperion-planning, oracle.com/performance-management/hyperion-financial-management, oracle.com/ae/performance-management/hyperion-planning, oracle.com/br/performance-management/hyperion-planning, oracle.com/bz/performance-management/hyperion-planning. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Hyperion's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Hyperion, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Hyperion by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Oracle Hyperion is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Hyperion, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.