Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 24 → 18 of 81
1 category · Named, not rankedPayt
11Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Payt was named 1 time in B2B credit management, where Chaser led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business19 of 86
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market58 of 108
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise76 of 80
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In b2b credit management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Payt for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B credit management | Receivables and billing | 0% | 58 of 108 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Chaser at 16% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Payt held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · B2B credit management · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 59 → 63 of 74
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B credit management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 58 of 108, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Payt across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Payt across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Payt/Chaser for SMEs needing fast reminder and payment convenience” Muse Glimmer 30B · B2B credit management · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Payt, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Payt was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Payt, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Payt was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Payt. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Payt and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
onguard.com11
chaserhq.com9
g2.com7
guideflow.com7
worldmetrics.org7
creditpulse.com6
highradius.com5
nuvo.com5
slashdot.org5
erpresearch.com4
Sixty-six of the sixty-six domain citations in answers naming Payt came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
paytm.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Payt takes 0% of first choices and Chaser takes 16%.ShowHide
Search and answers
paytm.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Payt takes 0% of first choices and Chaser takes 16%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “credit management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “b2b credit management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“payt”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 454,667 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 47,549 · 1,279 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 27,483
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 58 of 108 in B2B credit management
Segment leader
16%
Chaser
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on paytm.com
141
subdomains included
Content
129
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 89 | 10 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 29 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 7 | 0 | 2025-08-16 | ||
| News or press | 2 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2022-03-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Artificial intelligence blog
- 2026-09-28Upi blog
- 2026-09-28Digital gold blog
- 2026-09-25How to get more customers for your business with pi blog
- 2026-09-17Gold vs silver whats the difference and which one should you save in with paytm comparison
- 2026-09-15Sustainability blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page paytm.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Payt
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Payt is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Payt is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- India's Most Trusted Platform for BHIM UPI Payments, Money Transfers, Recharges, and other online payments
- Price stated
- 0 paytm.com
- Free plan or trial
- 0 paytm.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Payt's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: paytm.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Payt's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Payt, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Payt by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Payt is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Payt, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.