Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 73 → 80 of 81
1 category · RankedOnguard
22Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in B2B credit management for enterprise buyers
Rank 12 of 108 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business85 of 86
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 108
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise15 of 80
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
In b2b credit management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Onguard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B credit management | Receivables and billing | 2% | 12 of 108 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Chaser at 16% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Onguard held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · B2B credit management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 16 → 14 of 97
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 25 → 14 of 74
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B credit management | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 12 of 108 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Onguard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Onguard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The Best All-in-One Platform: Onguard ... frequently cited as a top choice for mid-market and enterprise companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · B2B credit management · direct prompt · first choice
“Best for mid-market and enterprise B2B companies looking to improve payment experience and reduce manual reconciliation.” Llama 4 Maverick · B2B credit management · direct prompt · alternative
“Onguard is a top choice for European mid-market and enterprise teams managing multiple entities and ERPs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · B2B credit management · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you are Europe-based with multiple legal entities/ERPs, Onguard is the dominant choice.” Muse Glimmer 30B · B2B credit management · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Onguard, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Onguard was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Onguard, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Onguard was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Onguard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Onguard and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
onguard.comYour site20
chaserhq.com19
worldmetrics.org18
nuvo.com14
zipdo.co13
highradius.com12
g2.com11
guideflow.com11
emagia.com10
creditpulse.com8
116 of the 136 domain citations in answers naming Onguard came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
onguard.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Onguard takes 2% of first choices and Chaser takes 16%.ShowHide
Search and answers
onguard.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Onguard takes 2% of first choices and Chaser takes 16%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “credit management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “b2b credit management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“onguard”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 485 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 380 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 33 · 0 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 578
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 image · 0 shown in the last 30 days
First shown June 2025, as Onguard B.V., verified.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 108 in B2B credit management
Segment leader
16%
Chaser
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 22 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 22 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on onguard.com
9,991
subdomains included
Content
92
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
7 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 71 | 6 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 7 | 0 | 2023-05-22 | ||
| News or press | 2 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 1 | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Comparison | 1 | 0 | 2026-03-18 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2026-02-04 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-17E invoicing what you need to know blog
- 2026-08-20E invoicing webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-03Onguard announces change of managing director blog
- 2026-07-133 lessons for credit management in 2026 what the fintech barometer shows about dso ownership blog
- 2026-07-02Credit management software utilities blog
- 2026-07-02Credit management software for transport logistics blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page onguard.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Onguard
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Onguard; a claim can dispute any of them.
OnGuard 1
Follow Onguard
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Onguard is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Onguard is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The AR software for multinational companies
- For
- credit and finance teams
- Certifications
- ISO 27001GDPR
- Customers named
- Soprema NLWereldhave BelgiumBNP Paribas Leasing Solutions
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Onguard's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: onguard.com, trust.onguard.com, onguard.com/solutions. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Onguard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Onguard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Onguard by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Onguard is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Onguard, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.