Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 15 of 120, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedProactis
6Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Proactis was named 4 times in Strategic sourcing and 1 other category, where oboloo led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market15 of 128
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise69 of 77
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Proactis for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 2% | 15 of 128 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 31 of 87 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 42% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Proactis held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Strategic sourcing · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 23 → 55 of 63
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 15 of 128, unchanged |
| Procure-to-pay | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 31 of 87, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Proactis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Proactis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Look for: A specialized mid-market solution (like Jaggaer, Ivalua, Proactis, or even cloud-first contenders like Spendwise).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Strategic sourcing · scale prompt · first choice
“Proactis is tailored for mid-market sourcing, offering balanced functionality and a user-friendly experience.” Mistral Small · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for: Mid-market organizations wanting flexibility and scalability” MiniMax M2.5 · Procure-to-pay · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Proactis, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Proactis was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Proactis, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Proactis was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Proactis. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 6 answers that named Proactis and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
spendflo.com3
b2bs.com2
g2.com2
guideflow.com2
appsruntheworld.com1
b2bsalescafe.wordpress.com1
bidsparq.com1
brex.com1
capterra.co.uk1
capterra.com1
Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Proactis came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Follow Proactis
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Proactis is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Proactis is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Market leading provider of modular spend management solutions
- For
- mid-market, service-focused organisations
- Customers named
- Wigan CouncilCaerphilly County Borough CouncilUniversity of SussexBetfredAvon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS TrustBright Horizons
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Proactis's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: proactis.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Proactis's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Proactis, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Proactis by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Proactis is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Proactis, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.