| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 11% | 2 of 85 | 6% | 17 | accepted challenger | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 8% now. |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 31 of 99 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 0% | 48 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Accounting software | Accounting and close | 0% | 37 of 55 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 44% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 0% | 46 of 73 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Oracle NetSuite at 39% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 0% | 41 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI accounting assistants | 0% | 8% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 8% now. | New this edition | Rank 2 of 85, unchanged |
| Board | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 31 of 99, unchanged |
| Account reconciliation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 48 of 82, unchanged |
| Accounting software | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 37 of 55, unchanged |
| ERP systems | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 46 of 73, unchanged |
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 41 of 77, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the strongest recommendation for an AI-driven accounting solution is Rillet, specifically leveraging its Aura AI agents.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI accounting assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Tools like Rillet, which pair AI with human oversight and a full audit trail, are safer choices.” Mistral Small · AI accounting assistants · negative prompt · first choice
“Rillet with Aura AI agents is the most purpose-built AI agent layer for accounting tasks” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI accounting assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“or Rillet if you want a more *AI-native* accounting system for a scaling team” Perplexity Sonar · AI accounting assistants · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“worth evaluating ... However, migration effort is a real cost, so weigh that carefully.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI accounting assistants · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 39 answers that named Rillet and are not a share of its labels.
117 of the 150 domain citations in answers naming Rillet came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 197 | 89 | 2026-09-28 | Revenue recognition, Accounting software | |
| Case study | 23 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 22 | 9 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 9 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | 4 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 1 | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-28 |
Every page rillet.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Rillet's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: rillet.com, rillet.com, trust.rillet.com, rillet.com/solution/cfo, rillet.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rillet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rillet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rillet by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Rillet is among the products AI models recommend first in AI accounting assistants this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.