AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Rubli · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Rubli

6Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Rubli was named 3 times in Lease accounting, where FinQuery led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Rubli for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Lease accountingAccounting and close0%27 of 710%3under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 29%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Rubli held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Lease accounting · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 19 → 26 of 59
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 44 → 25 of 64
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 40 → 29 of 65

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Lease accounting0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 44 → 27 of 71

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Rubli across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Standout multi-GAAP support; particularly strong for UK/Irish (FRS 102) and international entities” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rubli, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rubli was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
FinQuery5 of 61Not among the top eight
EZLease3 of 61Not among the top eight
DebtBook3 of 60Not among the top eight
Occupier3 of 60Not among the top eight
Visual Lease3 of 60Not among the top eight
Crunchafi2 of 60Not among the top eight
MRI ProLease2 of 60Not among the top eight
LeaseGuru1 of 61Not among the top eight
Nakisa Lease Administration1 of 61Not among the top eight
Accruent Lucernex1 of 60Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rubli. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Rubli and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com6
debtbook.com4
capterra.com3
finquery.com3
netgain.tech3
selecthub.com3
softwareadvice.co.uk3
accruent.com2
acquisition-international.com2
capterra.co.uk2

Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Rubli came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on rubli.co
54
subdomains included
Content
43
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
3 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Report or ebook21undated
Blog12undatedLease accounting
Template or tool5undated
Case study3undated
Comparison1undated
Glossary or explainer1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page rubli.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Rubli

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Rubli is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Lease Accounting Software for IFRS 16 & FRS 102
For
finance teams in SMEs and large organisations managing leases across entities, currencies, and accounting standards
Free plan or trial
Free, no sign-up required. rubli.co/products/asc-842
Hosting
EU
Customers named
BidcorpCalisenOmniaCTS Cement
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, certifications

What Rubli's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: rubli.co, rubli.co/products/asc-842, rubli.co/case-studies, rubli.co/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rubli's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rubli, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rubli by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Rubli is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Rubli, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rubli.co is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.