Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
SAP S/4HANA Finance · 1 category · RankedSAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting
34Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Financial consolidation for enterprise buyers
Rank 38 of 102 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business48 of 100
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market38 of 102
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise5 of 82
2%26 labels
accepted challenger
In financial consolidation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 38 of 102 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial consolidation · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 61 → 84 of 99
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 9 → 12 of 75
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 61 → 38 of 102 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ERP-native option for SAP customers ... well-suited for organizations deeply invested in SAP but requires migration” Muse Glimmer 30B · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative
“Deep SAP footprint: start with SAP Group Reporting.” GPT-6 Luna · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“steer clear of OneStream, Oracle Cloud EPM, or SAP Group Reporting” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · scale prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 34 answers that named SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
onestream.com21
maxima.ai16
prophix.com15
highradius.com12
consolidate.io10
guideflow.com10
bluecopa.com9
cubesoftware.com9
worldmetrics.org9
gartner.com8
119 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sap.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting takes 0% of first choices and Prophix takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sap.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting takes 0% of first choices and Prophix takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “consolidation tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial consolidation software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“sap s/4hana finance for group reporting”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- sap.com shared with SAP S/4HANA Finance's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,214,514 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 117,113 · 18,594 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 113,777
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 68 clicks and $1,251 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 38 of 102 in financial consolidation
Segment leader
24%
Prophix
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 34 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 34 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAP Group Reporting 3SAP S/4HANA Group Reporting 2SAP S/4HANA group reporting 1
Follow SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SAP S/4HANA Finance is the company behind SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting.ShowHide
The company
SAP S/4HANA Finance is the company behind SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Customers named
- AmadeusBT GroupPfizer
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sap.com/blogs/sap-finance-ai-at-scale, sap.com/blogs/sap-erp-for-intelligent-finance, sap.com/resources/sap-erp-for-finance-transformation, sap.com/resources/sap-erp-modernization-guide-for-finance, sap.com/cz/blogs/sap-finance-ai-at-scale. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.