Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 72 → 66 of 96
Oracle · 2 categories · RankedOracle Financial Consolidation and Close
30Judge labels
1First choices
8Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Financial consolidation for enterprise buyers
Rank 25 of 102 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business43 of 100
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market25 of 102
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise8 of 82
2%14 labels
accepted challenger
In financial consolidation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 25 of 102 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 22 of 85 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial consolidation · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 37 → 25 of 99
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 3% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 3% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 6 → 7 of 75
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 37 → 25 of 102 |
| Financial close manageme | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 45 → 22 of 85 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative10 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Oracle FCCS if you want a dedicated, cloud-first financial consolidation and close platform.” GPT-5.4 mini · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · first choice
“It offers seamless integration with Oracle GL accounts... However, it can be expensive and requires significant IT resources” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you're already on Oracle ERP, this offers the tightest integration with no data extraction friction.” Kimi K2 · Financial close manageme · comparative prompt · alternative
“Organizations seeking a dedicated cloud consolidation tool, especially those already using Oracle EPM” GPT-6 Luna · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 30 answers that named Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com11
bluecopa.com10
onestream.com10
numeric.io9
cfoshortlist.com8
docs.oracle.comYour site8
maxima.ai8
sap.com8
softwaresuggest.com8
learn.g2.com7
Seventy-nine of the eighty-seven domain citations in answers naming Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 20 a month (“oracle financial consolidation and close”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Oracle's site (oracle.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 102 in financial consolidation
Segment leader
24%
Prophix
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 30 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 28 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle Cloud EPM Financial Consolidation and Close 1Oracle Cloud EPM Financial Consolidation and Close (FCCS) 1Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close (FCCS) 1Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close (OFC) 1Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud (FCCS) 1
Follow Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close.ShowHide
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Close your books faster with more accuracy and flexibility.
- For
- companies evaluating EPM vendors
- Certifications
- IFRSGAAP
- Customers named
- ArgoMontefioreSRAM
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: oracle.com/performance-management/close-management, oracle.com/performance-management/financial-consolidation-close, oracle.com/performance-management/gartner-financial-close-magic-quadrant, oracle.com/apac/performance-management/close-management, oracle.com/asean/performance-management/close-management. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.