Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
2 categories · Named, not rankedThoughtSpot
14Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ThoughtSpot was named 6 times in Financial reporting and 1 other category, where Sage Intacct led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market26 of 105
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise27 of 109
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ThoughtSpot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 26 of 105 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SaaS metrics and analytics | Planning and analysis | 0% | 65 of 78 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 49% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ThoughtSpot held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial reporting · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 31 → 26 of 102
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 29 → 31 of 101
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 26 of 105 |
| SaaS metrics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 62 → 65 of 78 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ThoughtSpot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ThoughtSpot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“A search-driven, AI-first analytics platform designed to replace static dashboards.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
“ThoughtSpot stands out for AI-driven, search-based analytics” Mistral Small · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
“AI-driven search-based analytics.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ThoughtSpot, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ThoughtSpot was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ThoughtSpot, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ThoughtSpot was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ThoughtSpot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named ThoughtSpot and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
qlik.com5
thoughtspot.comYour site5
indinero.com4
plumhq.com4
baremetrics.com3
clickup.com3
databox.com3
draxlr.com3
gitnux.org3
larksuite.com3
Thirty-one of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming ThoughtSpot came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
thoughtspot.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ThoughtSpot takes 0% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
thoughtspot.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ThoughtSpot takes 0% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 33%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “reporting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 8,100 a month (“thoughtspot”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 269 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 207,491 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 14,489 · 1,192 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,441
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 61 clicks and $2,050 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 26 of 105 in financial reporting
Segment leader
33%
Sage Intacct
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on thoughtspot.com
8,927
subdomains included
Content
913
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,304
Product · Integration
44 · 15
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 327 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 181 | undated | |||
| News or press | 178 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 88 | 0 | 2026-02-20 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 72 | 4 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Case study | 37 | 0 | 2016-11-11 | ||
| Conference or event | 12 | 0 | 2026-06-11 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 11 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 6 | 4 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Data to dashboards instantly with spotterviz podcast or video
- 2026-09-29Ai assisted coding with spottercode podcast or video
- 2026-09-29Automated semantic modeling with thoughtspot podcast or video
- 2026-09-29How data builds team strategies and wins podcast or video
- 2026-09-24Introducing thoughtspot spreadsheets on live data blog
- 2026-09-22What is multiplayer ai glossary or explainer
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 15, 2026ThoughtSpot x Snowflake World Tour 2026Palais des Congrès, Paris, Paris, France · exhibits
- October 15, 2026ThoughtSpot x Snowflake World Tour 2026Javits North, New York, New York, United States · exhibits
- October 15, 2026Networking DinnersHôtel Plaza Athénée, Paris, France · takes part
- October 27, 2026ThoughtSpot x Snowflake World Tour 2026Rotterdam Ahoy, Rotterdam, Netherlands · exhibits
Last twelve months
- September 30, 2026ThoughtSpot x Snowflake World Tour 2026ExCeL, London, London, United Kingdom · exhibited
- September 29, 2026ThoughtSpot x Snowflake World Tour 2026Station Berlin, Berlin, Germany · exhibited
- September 28, 2026Networking DinnersSphere by Tim Raue, Berlin, Germany · took part
- September 23, 2026ThoughtSpot x Snowflake World Tour 20263Arena, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden · exhibited
- September 10, 2026 to September 11, 2026ThoughtSpot x Snowflake World Tour 2026Grand Prince Hotel, New Takanawa, Tokyo, Japan · exhibited
- March 10, 2026Trust by Design: Scaling Financial Analytics at NavanTheater 4 · spoke
- March 9, 2026 to March 11, 2026Gartner Data and Analytics Summit 2026Orlando · exhibited
- March 9, 2026ThoughtSpot, Fidelity Investment & Verisk on Scaling Competitive Edge with Agentic AnalyticsOsceola 2, Level 2 · spoke
As the event pages on thoughtspot.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page thoughtspot.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow ThoughtSpot
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ThoughtSpot is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ThoughtSpot is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Agentic Analytics platform that turns insights into action with AI agents, automated insights, and embedded intelligence.
- For
- Business Leaders; Data Leaders & Analysts; Product Teams & Developers
- Price stated
- Starting as low as $25 per user / per month (billed annually); Starting as low as $0.10 Per credit; Custom pricing tailored to your teams, data, and deployment needs.; Free for 1 year; Flexible pricing models aligned with your use case & GTM requirements.; Free thoughtspot.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 25 thoughtspot.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free trial thoughtspot.com
- Integrations claimed
- 6 thoughtspot.com
- Certifications
- SOC1SOC2SOC3ISO 27001CSA StarHIPPAGDPREU-US DPF
- Customers named
- ZencargoBramblesMidas PharmaBooking.comSephoraCarTrawlerHPAustin Capital Bank
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What ThoughtSpot's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: thoughtspot.com, thoughtspot.com/pricing, trust.thoughtspot.com, thoughtspot.com/product/model, thoughtspot.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ThoughtSpot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ThoughtSpot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ThoughtSpot by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ThoughtSpot is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ThoughtSpot, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.