Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 67 of 103, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedWhatagraph
6Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Whatagraph was named 4 times in Financial reporting and 1 other category, where Sage Intacct led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business68 of 105
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market97 of 105
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Whatagraph for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 97 of 105 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SaaS metrics and analytics | Planning and analysis | 0% | 76 of 78 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Whatagraph held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial reporting · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 94 of 102, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 94 → 97 of 105 |
| SaaS metrics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 76 of 78, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Whatagraph across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Whatagraph across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“one review notes that Whatagraph does not natively calculate MRR, churn, or LTV from billing data” Perplexity Sonar · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · hard negative
“Whatagraph: be cautious if you manage more than 50 clients, need custom transformations” Perplexity Sonar · Financial reporting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some users note occasional bugs and data discrepancies compared to source platforms” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial reporting · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Whatagraph, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Whatagraph was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Whatagraph, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Whatagraph was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Whatagraph. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Whatagraph and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
databox.com3
domo.com3
improvado.io3
linkedin.com3
teamwork.com3
axis-intelligence.com2
baremetrics.com2
designrevision.com2
indinero.com2
kanerika.com2
Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Whatagraph came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on whatagraph.com
942
subdomains included
Content
491
counted in the table below
Documentation
222
Product · Integration
0 · 65
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 304 | 69 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Template or tool | 79 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 45 | 29 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 35 | 2 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Case study | 14 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | 0 | 2025-05-23 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2023-06-15 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Ai marketing workflows blog
- 2026-09-21Agentic marketing blog
- 2026-09-19Ai marketing analytics tools blog
- 2026-09-17Build linkedin ads report blog
- 2026-09-15Digital marketing software blog
- 2026-09-14Best social media analytics tools blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page whatagraph.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Whatagraph
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Whatagraph is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Whatagraph is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-ready marketing intelligence built for scale
- For
- marketing agencies and brands
- Price stated
- Max from €699 per month, billed annually; Prime custom, billed annually whatagraph.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 699 whatagraph.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- 14 days with full Max access; no credit card required whatagraph.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 50 whatagraph.com · 72 whatagraph.com/integrations pages disagree
- Hosting
- EU Data Center
- Customers named
- Maatwerk OnlineRentableDtch. DigitalsYourFellowPeak SevenAmpilioMarket SolutionsSwash Labs
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications
What Whatagraph's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: whatagraph.com, whatagraph.com/pricing, whatagraph.com/case-studies, whatagraph.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Whatagraph's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Whatagraph, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Whatagraph by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Whatagraph is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Whatagraph, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.