Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 24 → 13 of 50
Microsoft Dynamics · 5 categories · RankedMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance
83Judge labels
2First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Accounting software for enterprise buyers
Rank 12 of 55 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market12 of 55
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise6 of 63
2%43 labels
accepted challenger
In accounting software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounting software | Accounting and close | 0% | 12 of 55 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 44% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Fixed asset accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 22 of 107 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 90 of 101 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 57 of 102 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 72 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Accounting software · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 6 of 58, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounting software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 12 of 55 |
| Fixed asset accounting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 22 of 107 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 62 → 90 of 101 |
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 57 of 102, unchanged |
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 42 → 72 of 105 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct20 labelsNone
Paraphrase12 labelsNone
Comparative18 labelsNone
Budget-constrained15 labels2
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative83 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“"#5: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance - Integrates fixed asset tracking, depreciation methods, and analytics"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best if you're already entrenched in Microsoft: Dynamics 365 Finance.” MiniMax M2.5 · Accounting software · direct prompt · alternative
“Check its built-in Fixed assets module before adding a separate product” GPT-6 Luna · Fixed asset accounting · direct prompt · alternative
“the pick for Microsoft-anchored mid-market” Muse Glimmer 30B · Accounting software · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Many established ERPs (like older versions of SAP, Oracle NetSuite, or Microsoft Dynamics) offer built-in liquidity tools” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, over the 83 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, over the 83 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 75 of the 83 answers that named Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
erpresearch.com30
ramp.com29
gitnux.org26
techrepublic.com20
dupple.com19
netsuite.com18
softwareadvice.com16
worldmetrics.org16
wifitalents.com14
financesonline.com13
201 of the 201 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
microsoft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance takes 0% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 44%.ShowHide
Search and answers
microsoft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance takes 0% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 44%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “accounting software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “accounting platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“microsoft dynamics 365 finance”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 21 a month
- Its company's site
- microsoft.com shared with Microsoft Dynamics's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 145,358,109 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,421,769 · 793,520 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,904,433
- Paid Google search
- 56 searches its ads show for, about 705 clicks and $12,455 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 12 of 55 in accounting software
Segment leader
44%
Sage Intacct
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 83 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 75 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance; a claim can dispute any of them.
Microsoft Dynamics 1
Follow Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Microsoft Dynamics is the company behind Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance.ShowHide
The company
Microsoft Dynamics is the company behind Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Maximalizujte finanční transparentnost a ziskovost.
- Price stated
- Za publikování nabídek na Microsoft Marketplace se neplatí žádné poplatky. Když si ale zákazníci koupí něco, co nabízíte přes Marketplace, vybíráme 3% poplatek za zprostředkování. Nabízíme o 50 % nižší poplatek za zprostředkování všech obnovení prodaných formou soukromých nabídek přes Marketplace. microsoft.com/cs-cz/isv/marketplace
- Free plan or trial
- Vyzkoušet zdarma microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/pricing-overview
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: microsoft.com, microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/pricing-overview, trust.microsoft.com, microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/solutions/ai, microsoft.com/cs-cz/isv/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.