| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 0% | 12 of 73 | 10% | 21 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 12 of 73 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“a Mid-Market cloud ERP (like NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Acumatica, Infor, Sage X3) would serve you better” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ERP systems · scale prompt · alternative
“the underrated industry specialist \u2014 particularly strong in food & beverage, fashion, chemicals” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ERP systems · comparative prompt · alternative
“Purpose-built for mid-market companies. Faster implementation than some competitors” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ERP systems · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“worth a look if you need industry-specific functionality” GPT-5.4 mini · ERP systems · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Infor and Epicor: History of multiple acquisitions ... Avoid if: Worried about vendor longevity” Grok 4.1 Fast · ERP systems · negative prompt · hard negative
“Often criticized for complex implementations and integration challenges” Kimi K2 · ERP systems · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 56 answers that named Infor CloudSuite and are not a share of its labels.
132 of the 132 domain citations in answers naming Infor CloudSuite came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,875 | 15 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| News or press | 1,583 | 2 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Conference or event | 752 | 2 | 2026-10-06 | ||
| Case study | 310 | 9 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 99 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 60 | 3 | 2026-10-01 | ||
| Comparison | 28 | 0 | 2025-08-25 | ||
| Podcast or video | 10 | 0 | 2023-07-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 6 | 0 | 2022-07-11 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2020-06-09 |
As the event pages on infor.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page infor.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Infor CloudSuite's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: infor.com, trust.infor.com, infor.com/platform, infor.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Infor CloudSuite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Infor CloudSuite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Infor CloudSuite by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: