Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 80 → 94 of 101
4 categories · Named, not rankedWorkday
36Judge labels
2First choices
6Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Workday was named 7 times in Corporate performance ma and 3 other categories, where Planful led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business109 of 116
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market74 of 99
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise8 of 73
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Workday for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 74 of 99 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 69 of 102 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 85 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Spend management platforms | Spend and procurement | 0% | 44 of 46 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 44% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Workday held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate performance ma · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 31 → 70 of 91
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 12 → 8 of 69
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 69 of 102 |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 74 of 99 |
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 45 → 85 of 105 |
| Spend management platfor | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 44 of 46, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Workday across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Workday across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labels2
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you want zero maintenance and a fresh UI, look at Workday.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Native ERP Modules (NetSuite/Workday): If you have a multi-system architecture or complex foreign entities.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 36 answers that named Workday and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com8
ramp.com7
gitnux.org5
guideflow.com5
us.fitgap.com5
gartner.com4
golimelight.com4
learn.g2.com4
oracle.com4
peoplegoal.com4
Fifty of the fifty domain citations in answers naming Workday came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
workday.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Workday takes 0% of first choices and Planful takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
workday.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Workday takes 0% of first choices and Planful takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “epm software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “epm platforms”
5
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,220,000 a month (“workday”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 23,848 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,213,450 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 69,259 · 7,130 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 28,599
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 74 of 99 in corporate performance ma
Segment leader
22%
Planful
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 36 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 29 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on workday.com
11,325
subdomains included
Content
4,000
counted in the table below
Documentation
7
Product · Integration
1,116 · 59
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 2,489 | 0 | 2026-02-26 | Expense management | |
| Blog | 1,125 | undated | Strategic sourcing, ERP systems | ||
| Podcast or video | 117 | 3 | 2026-07-30 | ERP systems | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 84 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 50 | 0 | 2025-06-18 | ||
| Comparison | 46 | 1 | 2026-07-02 | FP&A platforms | |
| Glossary or explainer | 43 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | ERP systems | |
| Conference or event | 18 | 0 | 2026-06-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 16 | 2 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| News or press | 12 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Create audit readiness checklist template or tool
- 2026-08-31Create audit readiness checklist template or tool
- 2026-07-30Future work podcast helen tupper squiggly careers podcast or video
- 2026-07-29Future work podcast copy paste economy podcast or video
- 2026-07-29Future work podcast copy paste economy podcast or video
- 2026-07-02Lawless ai vs true transformation comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page workday.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Workday
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday; a claim can dispute any of them.
Workday (Prism & Financial Management) 1
Follow Workday
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Workday is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Workday is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Enterprise AI Platform for HR, Finance, and IT
- For
- HR, Finance, and IT
- Customers named
- 7-ElevenBetterUpMedtronicCognizantJabilNetAppChipotleGreat Wolf Lodge
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Workday's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workday.com, trust.workday.com, workday.com/en-se/products/suite.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Workday is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workday, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.