Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 27 → 53 of 77
Zoho · 2 categories · Named, not rankedZoho Billing
12Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Zoho Billing was named 6 times in Revenue recognition and 1 other category, where Maxio led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business53 of 79
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market25 of 77
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise49 of 65
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In revenue recognition · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Zoho Billing for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 0% | 25 of 77 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 0% | 56 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Zoho Billing held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Revenue recognition · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 28 → 23 of 74
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 25 of 77 |
| Invoicing software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 56 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Zoho Billing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Zoho Billing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Affordable, includes subscription management, billing, and basic revenue recognition.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue recognition · comparative prompt · alternative
“Zoho Billing — Most Affordable ... Comprehensive solution at a very low entry price” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · alternative
“Includes reporting/analytics; scalable for small teams.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Zoho Billing, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zoho Billing was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Zoho Billing, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zoho Billing was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zoho Billing. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 12 answers that named Zoho Billing and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
wise.com9
zenskar.com7
guideflow.com6
ledgerup.ai6
itechguides.com5
myhospitalnow.com4
pipedrive.com4
zoho.comYour site4
hubifi.com3
softwaresuggest.com3
Forty-seven of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming Zoho Billing came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Zoho Billing stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Zoho Billing stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 18,100 a month (“zoho billing”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 29 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Zoho's site (zoho.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 77 in revenue recognition
Segment leader
20%
Maxio
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 12 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Zoho Billing
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Zoho Billing; a claim can dispute any of them.
Zoho Billing (with Rev Rec) 1
Follow Zoho Billing
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Zoho is the company behind Zoho Billing.ShowHide
The company
Zoho is the company behind Zoho Billing.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Zoho
- Zoho Analytics, Zoho Books, Zoho Books / Zoho Analytics, Zoho Books / Zoho Inventory, Zoho Books / Zoho Invoice, Zoho CRM, Zoho Creator, Zoho Expense and 8 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- End-to-end billing solution for your business
- For
- Businesses with one time billing requirements; businesses with one time and subscription billing requirements; enterprises
- Price stated
- Standard: $29 per Organization per Month; $25 per Organization per Month (Billed annually). Premium: $69 per Organization per Month; $59 per Organization per Month (Billed annually) zoho.com/billing/pricing
- Starting price
- 25 zoho.com/billing/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial zoho.com/billing/pricing
- Hosting
- US
- Customers named
- TagniFiUbindiAAA Band RentalsUENIAMWebTeeBaseRight Now MobilitySyncEazy
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications
What Zoho Billing's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: zoho.com/billing/pricing, zoho.com/billing/pricing-comparison, zoho.com/billing/subscription-billing-management, zoho.com/analytics/zoho-subscription-analytics.html, zoho.com/billing/solutions/saas. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho Billing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho Billing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zoho Billing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Zoho Billing is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zoho Billing, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.