Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 19 → 18 of 51
2 categories · RankedEpicor Kinetic
38Judge labels
0First choices
10Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in ERP systems for mid-market buyers
Rank 13 of 73 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 22 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Epicor Kinetic →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business17 of 56
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market13 of 73
0%22 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise39 of 47
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
In erp systems · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Epicor Kinetic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 0% | 13 of 73 | 18% | 22 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 83 of 99 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Epicor Kinetic held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · ERP systems · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 13 of 63, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 10 → 35 of 41
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 of 73, unchanged |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 83 of 99, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Epicor Kinetic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Epicor Kinetic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your B2B company is heavily product-centric... Epicor Kinetic is a premier choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ERP systems · direct prompt · alternative
“Epicor Kinetic | Complex manufacturing, automotive, aerospace” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ERP systems · scale prompt · alternative
“A top pick for manufacturing and distribution B2B companies” Mistral Small · ERP systems · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for Focused Distribution & Manufacturing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ERP systems · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“legacy Epicor builds. Many of these have been put into "sustained support" modes” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ERP systems · negative prompt · hard negative
“Infor and Epicor: ... leading to roadmap uncertainty and forced migrations” Grok 4.1 Fast · ERP systems · negative prompt · hard negative
“Traditional manufacturing ERPs (like Epicor, SAP, or NetSuite) cost tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars to implement.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ERP systems · budget prompt · soft negative
“Difficult initial implementation, integration and distributor collaboration issues, occasional crashes” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Epicor Kinetic, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Epicor Kinetic was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Epicor Kinetic, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Epicor Kinetic was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Epicor Kinetic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 38 answers that named Epicor Kinetic and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
erpresearch.com24
erp-pilot.com15
randgroup.com10
cio.com9
clefincode.com9
learn.g2.com9
linkedin.com9
netsuite.com8
techtarget.com8
elevatiq.com7
108 of the 108 domain citations in answers naming Epicor Kinetic came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
epicor.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Epicor Kinetic takes 0% of first choices and Oracle NetSuite takes 39%.ShowHide
Search and answers
epicor.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Epicor Kinetic takes 0% of first choices and Oracle NetSuite takes 39%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “erp system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “erp systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“epicor kinetic”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 39 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 49,616 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,653 · 473 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,267
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 13 of 73 in ERP systems
Segment leader
39%
Oracle NetSuite
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 38 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 36 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on epicor.com
3,873
subdomains included
Content
1,884
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
551 · 322
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 967 | undated | ERP systems, Accounts receivable auto | ||
| Podcast or video | 282 | undated | |||
| Case study | 264 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 206 | undated | ERP systems | ||
| News or press | 112 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 31 | undated | ERP systems | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page epicor.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Epicor Kinetic
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Epicor Kinetic; a claim can dispute any of them.
Epicor 11Epicor (Kinetic / Prophet 21) 1Epicor ERP (Planning/Analytics Modules) 1
Follow Epicor Kinetic
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Epicor Kinetic is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Epicor Kinetic is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- future-focused ERP and smart factory technology
- For
- manufacturing operations
- Customers named
- Enjet Aero
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Epicor Kinetic's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: epicor.com, epicor.com/en/company/compliance, epicor.com/en-us/products/a-to-z, epicor.com/en/customers, epicor.com/en-us/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Epicor Kinetic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Epicor Kinetic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Epicor Kinetic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Epicor Kinetic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Epicor Kinetic, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.