Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 63 of 73, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedAmex Corporate Platinum
15Judge labels
0First choices
6Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Amex Corporate Platinum was named 9 times in Corporate cards, where Ramp led with 52%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business64 of 78
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market56 of 67
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise29 of 65
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In corporate cards · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Amex Corporate Platinum for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate cards | Spend and procurement | 0% | 56 of 67 | 44% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 52% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Amex Corporate Platinum held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate cards · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 42 → 51 of 61
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 13 → 29 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate cards | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 42 → 56 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Amex Corporate Platinum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Amex Corporate Platinum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Focus on programs like Ramp, Brex, Rippling Spend, Citi/JPMorgan Commercial, or Amex Corporate Platinum/Gold” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate cards · scale prompt · alternative
“Amex Corporate Platinum for travel-heavy teams valuing lounge access and travel credits” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Corporate cards · comparative prompt · alternative
“Amex for premium travel benefits and established reliability” Kimi K2 · Corporate cards · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“$550 annual fee | High annual fee with no clear justification for smaller businesses” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate cards · negative prompt · hard negative
“traditional options like Amex Corporate Platinum ($550 fee, $10M+ revenue) are out” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate cards · budget prompt · hard negative
“Why be cautious? It has a very high annual fee ($550) and requires a minimum revenue of $10 million.” Mistral Small · Corporate cards · negative prompt · soft negative
“High fees ($695+/user), personal guarantee possible, weak on AP/savings.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate cards · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Amex Corporate Platinum, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Amex Corporate Platinum was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Amex Corporate Platinum, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Amex Corporate Platinum was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Amex Corporate Platinum. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Amex Corporate Platinum and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
airwallex.com10
brex.com10
corpay.com9
aspireapp.com8
bill.com8
nerdwallet.com8
ramp.com8
rippling.com8
navan.com6
fitsmallbusiness.com5
Eighty of the eighty domain citations in answers naming Amex Corporate Platinum came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
corporate.cards is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Amex Corporate Platinum takes 0% of first choices and Ramp takes 52%.ShowHide
Search and answers
corporate.cards is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Amex Corporate Platinum takes 0% of first choices and Ramp takes 52%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “corporate card program”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “corporate card programs”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“amex corporate platinum”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 13 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 65 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 82 · 0 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 30
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 56 of 67 in corporate cards
Segment leader
52%
Ramp
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Amex Corporate Platinum
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Amex Corporate Platinum; a claim can dispute any of them.
American Express Corporate Platinum 2Amex Corporate Platinum/Gold 1
Follow Amex Corporate Platinum
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Amex Corporate Platinum's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Amex Corporate Platinum, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Amex Corporate Platinum by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Amex Corporate Platinum is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Amex Corporate Platinum, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.