Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 33 → 37 of 47
AngelList · 1 category · RankedAngelList Stack
47Judge labels
1First choices
28Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Cap table management for mid-market buyers
Rank 12 of 42 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 57% of its 21 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of AngelList Stack →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business52 of 53
0%17 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market12 of 42
2%21 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise51 of 52
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
In cap table management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named AngelList Stack for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cap table management | Equity and corporate | 2% | 12 of 42 | 57% | 21 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, AngelList Stack held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Cap table management · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 38 → 10 of 39
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 37 → 47 of 48
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cap table management | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 12 of 42 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated AngelList Stack across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated AngelList Stack across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative17 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative18 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you are a US Company: Go with AngelList Stack. It is the most feature-rich for $0 cost.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cap table management · budget prompt · first choice
“Free cap table management for US startups ... Cons: Less compelling as standalone cap table tool” MiniMax M2.5 · Cap table management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Early-stage founders who are incorporating a new company.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cap table management · comparative prompt · alternative
“AngelList Stack — Free for US Companies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cap table management · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“AngelList stopped taking new standalone cap table customers in 2026, so free AngelList is no longer an option for new companies.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Cap table management · budget prompt · hard negative
“No longer accepting new customers since August 2026 and sunsetting overall—unsuitable for anyone starting fresh.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cap table management · negative prompt · hard negative
“it stopped accepting new customers in August 2026, so new adopters should avoid it as an onboarding choice” Perplexity Sonar · Cap table management · negative prompt · hard negative
“it's recommended to avoid AngelList Stack as it stopped accepting new customers in August 2026” Llama 4 Maverick · Cap table management · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AngelList Stack, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AngelList Stack was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AngelList Stack, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AngelList Stack was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AngelList Stack. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 47 answers that named AngelList Stack and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
waveup.com29
guideflow.com25
qapita.com25
cakeequity.com24
resources.rework.com22
valueaddvc.com22
hirechore.com20
vcbeast.com18
ctacquisitions.com17
equitylist.co16
218 of the 218 domain citations in answers naming AngelList Stack came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
angellist.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AngelList Stack takes 2% of first choices and Carta takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
angellist.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AngelList Stack takes 2% of first choices and Carta takes 33%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “cap table platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cap table management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“angellist stack”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 77,051 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,649 · 475 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,005
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 42 in cap table management
Segment leader
33%
Carta
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 47 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 47 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on angellist.com
473
subdomains included
Content
247
counted in the table below
Documentation
56
Product · Integration
4 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 181 | 9 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 47 | 0 | 2024-01-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 9 | 0 | 2020-05-13 | ||
| Case study | 5 | 0 | 2026-03-16 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2022-02-09 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-18The impossibility of indexing seed blog
- 2026-09-04Fund benchmarks a mid year 2026 refresh blog
- 2026-08-28The Semantic Layer Nobody Maintains blog
- 2026-08-21What leading gps are using angellist link for so far blog
- 2026-07-23Introducing angellist link blog
- 2026-07-22Fipvcc what fund managers need to know blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page angellist.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as AngelList Stack
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AngelList Stack; a claim can dispute any of them.
AngelList 7
Follow AngelList Stack
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
AngelList is the company behind AngelList Stack.ShowHide
The company
AngelList is the company behind AngelList Stack.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from AngelList
- AngelList Cap Table
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The financial system for private markets; a portfolio of businesses that move capital through private markets.
- For
- GPs, investors in startups, accredited investors looking to expand their access to startups and funds, and funds of all sizes.
- Price stated
- One-time setup fee $8k; Flat passthrough rate of $2k for state regulatory costs, also known as blue sky fees; Total SPV fees are capped at 10% of the raised amount, excluding add-on service fees. angellist.com/pricing/spvs
- Starting price
- 8000 angellist.com/pricing/spvs
- Certifications
- 506(b)506(c)SOC2 certification
- Customers named
- Brian NicholsNiv DrorSieva KozinskyCoinListGalaxyVanEck
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What AngelList Stack's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: angellist.com, angellist.com/pricing/spvs, angellist.com/solutions/crypto, angellist.com/blog/category/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AngelList Stack's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AngelList Stack, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AngelList Stack by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AngelList Stack is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AngelList Stack, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.