Every category where a model named Bluecopa for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Cash application	Receivables and billing	0%	33 of 83	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Account reconciliation	Accounting and close	0%	19 of 82	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Financial close management	Accounting and close	0%	19 of 85	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Accounts receivable automation	Receivables and billing	0%	23 of 79	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Upflow at 17%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
AI accounting assistants	Accounting and close	0%	39 of 85	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 22%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Chargeback management	Receivables and billing	0%	40 of 81	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Chargeflow at 24%
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	47 of 102	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Bluecopa held within the floor in all seven categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Cash application · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 27 → 30 of 79

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 28 → 22 of 58

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Cash application	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 27 → 33 of 83
Account reconciliation	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 26 → 19 of 82
Financial close manageme	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 17 → 19 of 85
Accounts receivable auto	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 23 of 79, unchanged
AI accounting assistants	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 39 of 85, unchanged
Chargeback management	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 40 of 81, unchanged
Financial consolidation	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 47 of 102, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Bluecopa across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	2	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	1	2	0	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative16 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative6 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Modern API-first platforms (like Stuut, Tesorio, Bluecopa) that connect to ERPs in 3-4 days” Kimi K2 · Accounts receivable auto · negative prompt · first choice

“Top Safer Bets (High Ratings): Bluecopa (4.8/5)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cash application · negative prompt · first choice

“Ideal for mid-market accounting teams that want an intuitive, checklist-driven close built around Excel.” Mistral Small · Financial close manageme · direct prompt · alternative

“Bluecopa offers AI-native reconciliation unified with Order-to-Cash and Procure-to-Pay.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Account reconciliation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Cash application sits disconnected from treasury and R2R (record-to-report) processes” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cash application · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bluecopa, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bluecopa was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HighRadius27 of 408Not among the top eight

BlackLine20 of 407Not among the top eight

FloQast15 of 401Not among the top eight

OneStream13 of 402Not among the top eight

Numeric12 of 401Not among the top eight

Billtrust12 of 400Not among the top eight

Trintech11 of 400Not among the top eight

Prophix One7 of 400Not among the top eight

BlackLine Cash Application6 of 401Not among the top eight

Sage Intacct6 of 401Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bluecopa. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 40 answers that named Bluecopa and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bluecopa.comYour site40

prophix.com18

highradius.com16

maxima.ai14

learn.g2.com12

g2.com11

numeric.io11

guideflow.com10

emagia.com8

gitnux.org8

108 of the 148 domain citations in answers naming Bluecopa came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bluecopa.com/blog/cash-application-softwares9

learn.g2.com/best-financial-close-software9

bluecopa.com/blog/financial-close-softwares8

prophix.com/blog/the-10-best-account-reconciliation-software8

bluecopa.com/blog/account-reconciliation-tools7

bluecopa.com/blog/enterprise-reconciliation-softwares7

prophix.com/blog/best-financial-close-software7

bluecopa.com/blog/close-management-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

bluecopa.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Bluecopa takes 0% of first choices and Versapay takes 9%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “cash application tools”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “cash application software”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 50 a month (“bluecopa”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 4 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,412 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 773 · 5 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 601
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 33 of 83 in cash application

Segment leader

Versapay

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 40 answers
Its own site cited: in 40 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on bluecopa.com

399

subdomains included

Content

355

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

11 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	202	95	2026-09-28	Account reconciliation, Cash application
Glossary or explainer	110	2	2026-09-28	Account reconciliation, Cash application
Comparison	21	16	2026-09-28	Account reconciliation, Accounting software
Case study	8	undated
Report or ebook	7	undated
Template or tool	7	5	2026-08-13	Account reconciliation

Most recent

2026-09-28What is credit card reconciliation glossary or explainer
2026-09-28Versapay alternatives comparison
2026-09-28Intercompany reconciliation blog
2026-09-28General ledger reconciliation blog
2026-09-28Esker alternatives comparison
2026-09-28Reconciliation software for saas enterprise blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page bluecopa.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Bluecopa

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bluecopa; a claim can dispute any of them.

BlueCopA 1

Follow Bluecopa

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Bluecopa is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Unified AI Finance Operations Platform
bluecopa.com
For: enterprise finance teams
bluecopa.com
Integrations claimed: 200 bluecopa.com
Certifications: fully compliant with the personal data privacy and protection safeguards mandated by the EUaligned with CCPA mandates on securely handling personal information of usersSOC 2 Type ISOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2013
Customers named: Yatra.comHackerearthDiverseyYatraIndia's premier e-commerce platformPorterPurpllea major financial services provider
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What Bluecopa's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: bluecopa.com, bluecopa.com, bluecopa.com/security, bluecopa.com/platform/order-to-cash, bluecopa.com/resources/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bluecopa's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bluecopa, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bluecopa by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Bluecopa is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bluecopa, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.