Every category where a model named Cash App for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Contractor payments	Spend and procurement	0%	95 of 98	100%	4	under 10 labels · led by Tipalti at 22%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Cash application	Receivables and billing	0%	83 of 83	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Cross-border payments and FX	Treasury and cash	0%	86 of 87	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 39%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Business bill pay	Treasury and cash	0%	92 of 98	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by BILL at 32%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
AML and transaction monitoring	Tax and compliance	0%	88 of 108	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33%

Movement

Since September 2026, Cash App held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Contractor payments · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 67 → 75 of 78

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 77 → 82 of 85

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 46 → 61 of 70

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Contractor payments	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 77 → 95 of 98
Cash application	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 82 → 83 of 83
Cross-border payments	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 68 → 86 of 87
Business bill pay	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 62 → 92 of 98
AML monitoring	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 88 of 108, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Cash App across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	3	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	3	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative29 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Block, Inc. (the parent company of Cash App) settled an $80 million fine with state regulators” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cross-border payments · negative prompt · hard negative

“Skip P2P apps (Zelle, Venmo, Cash App) for any bill, rent, or purchase from a stranger.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Business bill pay · negative prompt · hard negative

“Platforms to avoid/use with caution: Venmo, Cash App, Zelle, and personal PayPal accounts.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contractor payments · negative prompt · hard negative

“P2P Payment Apps (Venmo, Zelle, Cash App) - Not designed for cross-border payments” Kimi K2 · Cross-border payments · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cash App, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cash App was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Venmo21 of 290Not among the top eight

Zelle20 of 290Not among the top eight

Wise Business10 of 291Not among the top eight

PayPal MassPay9 of 290Not among the top eight

Stripe7 of 291Not among the top eight

BlackLine Cash Application7 of 290Not among the top eight

HighRadius7 of 290Not among the top eight

Billtrust6 of 290Not among the top eight

Deel6 of 290Not among the top eight

Payoneer Workforce Management6 of 290Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cash App. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 29 answers that named Cash App and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com13

trustpilot.com10

highradius.com8

bbb.org6

finance-ai-index.com6

getontop.com6

learn.g2.com6

paypal.com6

remote.com6

4dev.com5

Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Cash App came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

getontop.com/blog/contractor-payment-services6

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-cash-application-automation-tools6

remote.com/blog/payroll/best-contractor-payment-tools6

4dev.com/blog/best-contractor-payment-software5

finance-ai-index.com/receivables/cash-application/2026-09/smb5

g2.com/categories/contractor-payments5

ledge.co/content/cash-application-software5

propelrc.com/best-way-to-pay-contractors5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cashflowpick.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cash App takes 0% of first choices and Tipalti takes 22%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “contractor payment platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “contractor payments and 1099 platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,500,000 a month (“cash app”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 88,778 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 4 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 15 · 0 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 34
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 95 of 98 in contractor payments

Segment leader

22%

Tipalti

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 29 answers
Its own site cited: in 29 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on cashflowpick.com

176

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	49	30	2026-09-22	Expense management, Accounting software
Comparison	47	38	2026-09-23
Template or tool	3	0	2026-06-29

Most recent

2026-09-23Quickbooks purchase order vs bill comparison
2026-09-22Accounts receivable automation statistics 2026 blog
2026-09-22Avidxchange alternatives comparison
2026-09-13Accounts payable automation statistics 2026 blog
2026-09-12Divvy vs expensify comparison
2026-09-12Spendesk alternatives comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cashflowpick.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name expense management (10); 0 name its categories the models place it in. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Cash App

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cash App; a claim can dispute any of them.

Block/Cash App 1Cash App (Square) 1

Follow Cash App

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cash App's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cash App, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cash App by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Cash App is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cash App, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.