Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
1 category · Named, not rankedComarch
15Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Comarch was named 5 times in Global e-invoicing compl, where Avalara E-Invoicing led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market35 of 136
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise6 of 90
4%9 labels
under the label threshold
In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Comarch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 35 of 136 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Comarch held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Global e-invoicing compl · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 86 → 31 of 116
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 6 of 87, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 86 → 35 of 136 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Comarch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Comarch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“High‑volume, governed e‑invoice processing with measurable status | Comarch” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global e-invoicing compl · direct prompt · alternative
“evaluate Sovos and Comarch alongside it” Perplexity Sonar · Global e-invoicing compl · direct prompt · alternative
“*Best Value for International Operations*” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“G2 reviewers noted setup complexity and difficult navigation for Comarch EDI and e-Invoicing” GPT-5.4 mini · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Comarch, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Comarch was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Comarch, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Comarch was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Comarch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Comarch and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
comarch.comYour site9
mindsprint.com8
sourceforge.net7
highradius.com6
zipdo.co6
avalara.com5
taxtech500.com5
vatit.com5
zycus.com5
europe.thomsonreuters.com4
Fifty-one of the sixty domain citations in answers naming Comarch came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
comarch.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Comarch takes 0% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
comarch.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Comarch takes 0% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “e-invoicing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “e-invoicing compliance platform”
9
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“comarch”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 24 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,441 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,906 · 75 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,046
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 35 of 136 in global e-invoicing compl
Segment leader
25%
Avalara E-Invoicing
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on comarch.com
6,353
subdomains included
Content
3,997
counted in the table below
Documentation
25
Product · Integration
37 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 1,641 | 16 | 2026-09-28 | Global e-invoicing compl, Business banking | |
| Blog | 975 | 10 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 920 | 6 | 2026-10-14 | ||
| Case study | 181 | 0 | 2013-06-24 | Supplier management | |
| Report or ebook | 119 | 1 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 71 | 0 | 2026-01-26 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 43 | 0 | 2026-03-20 | ||
| Podcast or video | 31 | 0 | 2026-05-28 | ||
| Comparison | 14 | 1 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-14The forecourt changed did your loyalty program conference or event
- 2026-10-14Conferences and seminars conference or event
- 2026-09-29Catch comarch at loma loyalty congress mexico 2026 conference or event
- 2026-09-28Combining sports with social responsibility to support the raknroll foundation news or press
- 2026-09-25Stop building alone comarch launches the partner knowledge hub to rewire the global loyalty ecosystem news or press
- 2026-09-23Ai gamification and the everyday bank loyaltys next chapter in asean conference or event
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 30, 2026Beyond Points: Artificial Intelligence and the New Loyalty in MexicoREWARDS Stage · spoke
- September 29, 2026 to September 30, 2026Catch Comarch at LOMA Loyalty Congress Mexico 2026WTC Mexico City, Mexico City · exhibited
- September 8, 2026 to September 9, 2026Comarch Hits the 2026 International Leaders in Loyalty SummitMarriott Crystal Towers, Cape Town, South Africa · sponsored
- June 16, 2026 to June 18, 2026Comarch at NACS Convenience Summit Europe 2026Warsaw, Poland · sponsored
- December 10, 2025 to December 11, 2025Telecom Review Leaders’ Summit 2025Dubai, UAE · sponsored
As the event pages on comarch.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page comarch.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Comarch
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Comarch; a claim can dispute any of them.
Comarch EDI and e-Invoicing 1Comarch e-Invoicing 1
Follow Comarch
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Comarch is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Comarch is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Global software house delivering tailored IT systems for your business.
- For
- businesses
- Price stated
- Please leave your contact details and we will sent Comarch ESEF pricing plans to your email address. comarch.com/esef/pricing
- Customers named
- BP GLOBALTelefónica GlobalVodafone GermanyAXA Assurances LuxembourgHeidelberg MaterialsHeathrow AirportAuchan RetailJetblue Airways
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Comarch's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: comarch.com, comarch.com/esef/pricing, comarch.com/trade-and-services/ict/knowledge/security, comarch.com/healthcare/products, comarch.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Comarch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Comarch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Comarch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Comarch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Comarch, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.