Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 28 → 10 of 46
1 category · Named, not rankedCorporate Traveler
14Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Corporate Traveler was named 4 times in Corporate travel managem, where Navan led with 53%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 49
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market20 of 61
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise27 of 49
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Corporate Traveler for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 20 of 61 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Navan at 53% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Corporate Traveler held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate travel managem · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 58 → 18 of 57
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 25 of 46, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel managem | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 58 → 20 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Corporate Traveler across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Corporate Traveler across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“a good option if you want an SME/mid-market agency model with human support” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Corporate Traveler, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Corporate Traveler was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Corporate Traveler, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Corporate Traveler was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Corporate Traveler. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Corporate Traveler and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com11
navan.com9
business.booking.com8
ottotheagent.com7
perk.com7
brex.com6
ramp.com6
capterra.com4
gartner.com4
learn.g2.com4
Sixty-six of the sixty-six domain citations in answers naming Corporate Traveler came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
corporatetraveler.us is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Corporate Traveler takes 0% of first choices and Navan takes 53%.ShowHide
Search and answers
corporatetraveler.us is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Corporate Traveler takes 0% of first choices and Navan takes 53%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “travel management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “corporate travel booking platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“corporate traveler”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 739 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 8,971 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,362 · 112 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 747
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 61 in corporate travel managem
Segment leader
53%
Navan
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on corporatetraveler.us
302
subdomains included
Content
224
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 1
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 124 | 2 | 2026-09-10 | Corporate travel managem | |
| News or press | 42 | undated | |||
| Case study | 22 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 18 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 11 | 0 | 2025-03-26 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-10Business travel routes tri state area blog
- 2026-07-20How to select a tmc blog
- 2026-05-25Corporate travel budget leaks blog
- 2025-09-15Eu travel updates blog
- 2025-03-26Frequent flyer checklist template or tool
- 2025-03-19Guide business travel economy classes explained blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- March 2, 2026 to March 3, 2026BIO Investment & Growth SummitMiami Beach · sponsored
As the event pages on corporatetraveler.us state them, read October 5, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page corporatetraveler.us exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as Corporate Traveler
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Corporate Traveler; a claim can dispute any of them.
Corporate Traveller 1
Follow Corporate Traveler
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Corporate Traveler is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Corporate Traveler is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Manage business travel with an intuitive all-in-one platform and corporate travel management solutions built for small businesses and growing enterprises.
- For
- small businesses and growing enterprises
- Price stated
- Get up to $10,000 back in booking fees corporatetraveler.us
- Free plan or trial
- Take Melon for a test drive with our interactive tour, no signup required. corporatetraveler.us
- Customers named
- New EraNPACTEliquent Life SciencesVizioPrescientBumbleStructure TherapeuticsIcon Films
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Corporate Traveler's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: corporatetraveler.us, corporatetraveler.us/en-us/resources/case-studies, corporatetraveler.us/en-us/what-we-do/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Corporate Traveler's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Corporate Traveler, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Corporate Traveler by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Corporate Traveler is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Corporate Traveler, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.