Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 18 → 24 of 46
2 categories · Named, not rankedRoutespring
11Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Routespring was named 9 times in Corporate travel managem and 1 other category, where Navan led with 53%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business27 of 49
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market6 of 61
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise8 of 49
2%1 label
under the label threshold
In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Routespring for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel management | Spend and procurement | 2% | 6 of 61 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Navan at 53% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Expense management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 43 of 54 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 35% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Routespring held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate travel managem · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 6 of 57, unchanged
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 11 → 8 of 46
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel managem | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 of 61, unchanged |
| Expense management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 43 of 54 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Routespring across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Routespring across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Some of the top options include Navan, Perk, and Routespring” Llama 4 Maverick · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · first choice
“If your team values ease of use and fast deployment above all else, add Routespring to that list.” Kimi K2 · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · alternative
“Routespring is ideal for those seeking corporate rates without a software contract” Mistral Small · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · alternative
“a strong fit for mid-market firms moving off legacy TMCs” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Routespring, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Routespring was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Routespring, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Routespring was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Routespring. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Routespring and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
navan.com9
ottotheagent.com9
business.booking.com5
g2.com5
itilite.com5
learn.g2.com5
perk.com5
bill.com4
brex.com4
ramp.com4
Fifty-five of the fifty-five domain citations in answers naming Routespring came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
routespring.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Routespring takes 2% of first choices and Navan takes 53%.ShowHide
Search and answers
routespring.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Routespring takes 2% of first choices and Navan takes 53%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “travel management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “corporate travel booking platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“routespring”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 674 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 416 · 8 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 541
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 6 of 61 in corporate travel managem
Segment leader
53%
Navan
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on routespring.com
533
subdomains included
Content
413
counted in the table below
Documentation
9
Product · Integration
4 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 372 | 1 | 2026-08-01 | Expense management, Corporate travel managem | |
| Comparison | 17 | 2 | 2026-08-01 | Corporate travel managem | |
| Template or tool | 8 | 1 | 2026-08-01 | Corporate travel managem | |
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 1 | 2026-08-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 5 | 3 | 2026-07-25 | ||
| Case study | 3 | 0 | 2026-06-18 | Corporate travel managem | |
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2026-01-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-01Crew travel integration readiness checklist template or tool
- 2026-08-01What is a crew travel api glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-01Api vs sftp crew travel integration comparison
- 2026-08-01Crew travel automation pilot guide blog
- 2026-08-01Build vs buy crew travel automation comparison
- 2026-07-25Automated bookings report or ebook
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 29, 2025 to October 30, 2025North American Crew Utilization (NACU) Conference 2025Silverton Ballroom, Denver, Denver, US · sponsored
As the event pages on routespring.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page routespring.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Routespring
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Routespring is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Routespring is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Powered Travel Management for Airlines.
- For
- Airlines
- Price stated
- Contact for pricing routespring.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001:2022
- Hosting
- Worldwide
- Customers named
- FLY4 AirlinesGotionPRS GlobalDeepgramLG Ads
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What Routespring's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: routespring.com, routespring.com/pricing, routespring.com/security, routespring.com/platform/api, routespring.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Routespring's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Routespring, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Routespring by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Routespring is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Routespring, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.