AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › DOKKA Close · October 2026 Edition
DOKKA · 1 category · Named, not ranked

DOKKA Close

9Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. DOKKA Close was named 1 time in Financial close manageme, where FloQast led with 55%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In financial close manageme · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named DOKKA Close for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Financial close managementAccounting and close0%32 of 850%1under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, DOKKA Close held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Financial close manageme · by segment

Small business▼−8Since September 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 3 → 20 of 88
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 7 → 27 of 77

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Financial close manageme2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 7 → 32 of 85

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated DOKKA Close across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“DOKKA Close is specifically designed for mid-market teams.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Financial close manageme · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DOKKA Close, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DOKKA Close was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
FloQast8 of 93Not among the top eight
Numeric8 of 92Not among the top eight
BlackLine8 of 90Not among the top eight
Trintech7 of 90Not among the top eight
Workiva7 of 90Not among the top eight
OneStream6 of 90Not among the top eight
Vena6 of 90Not among the top eight
Prophix5 of 90Not among the top eight
Datarails4 of 90Not among the top eight
Lucanet4 of 90Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DOKKA Close. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named DOKKA Close and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

dokka.comYour site9
g2.com7
aicostadvisory.com6
smallbiz.ai5
finance-ai-index.com4
numeric.io4
xenett.com4
prophix.com3
thedigitalmerchant.com3
us.fitgap.com3

Thirty-nine of the forty-eight domain citations in answers naming DOKKA Close came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

dokka.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, DOKKA Close takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 55%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “close management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial close management software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
not counted (“dokka close”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Its company's site
dokka.com shared with DOKKA's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 9,606 a month
Searches its site ranks for
4,325 · 18 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,113
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 82 image, 34 text, 4 video · 17 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2025, as DOKKA A.I. Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 64 in the year, 56 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 32 of 85 in financial close manageme
Segment leader
55%
FloQast
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
9 answers
Its own site cited
in 9 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow DOKKA Close

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

DOKKA is the company behind DOKKA Close.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Financial Close Automation Software
For
finance teams; modern CFOs and finance teams
Integrations claimed
4 dokka.com/dokka-vs-vic-ai
Certifications
ISO 27001 certifiedSOC 2® ExaminedISO27001 security standardsGDPRISO 27001SOC 2® Type IISOC 2® Type II examination
Customers named
Mud BayWild Marketing GroupAdamaRiskifiedJFrogVoneus Broadband
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What DOKKA Close's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: dokka.com/about-dokka, dokka.com/dokka-vs-yooz, dokka.com/dokka-vs-velixo, dokka.com/dokka-vs-vic-ai, dokka.com/dokka-vs-floqast. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DOKKA Close's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DOKKA Close, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DOKKA Close by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where DOKKA Close is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name DOKKA Close, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dokka.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.