AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Cin7 · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Cin7

15Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in ERP systems for small business buyers
Rank 20 of 73 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In erp systems · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cin7 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
ERP systemsAccounting and close0%20 of 730%3under 10 labels · led by Oracle NetSuite at 39%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Cin7 held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · ERP systems · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 11 → 10 of 51
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 28 → 21 of 63

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
ERP systems0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 28 → 20 of 73

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Cin7 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“a cloud-based ERP system ... with costs starting at around $299 per month” Llama 4 Maverick · ERP systems · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cin7, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cin7 was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Odoo12 of 159Not among the top eight
Oracle NetSuite11 of 152Not among the top eight
Acumatica10 of 152Not among the top eight
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central10 of 152Not among the top eight
ERPNext9 of 154Not among the top eight
Zoho One8 of 151Not among the top eight
Katana8 of 150Not among the top eight
SAP Business One5 of 151Not among the top eight
Epicor Kinetic3 of 150Not among the top eight
QuickBooks3 of 150Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cin7. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 15 answers that named Cin7 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cin7.comYour site11
erpresearch.com11
randgroup.com7
dynamicssquare.com5
forbes.com5
gushwork.ai5
erp-pilot.com4
top10erp.org4
erpfocus.com3
g2.com3

Forty-seven of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming Cin7 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cin7.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cin7 takes 0% of first choices and Oracle NetSuite takes 39%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “erp system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “erp systems”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
3,600 a month (“cin7”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
96 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 55,257 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,455 · 302 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,557
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 6 clicks and $180 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
68 ads · 51 text, 16 video, 1 image · 57 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2023, as CIN7 LIMITED, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 28 in the year, 40 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 73 in ERP systems
Segment leader
39%
Oracle NetSuite
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
15 answers
Its own site cited
in 14 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on cin7.com
421
subdomains included
Content
301
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
15 · 51
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog184442026-09-25
News or press4542026-09-15
Case study3102024-11-18
Comparison1512026-08-20
Webinar or virtual event1112026-08-11
Glossary or explainer722026-09-16
Conference or event312026-08-13
Template or tool312026-09-24
Report or ebook2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cin7.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Cin7

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Cin7 is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Inventory Management Software for Modern Sellers
For
Modern sellers
Price stated
Pricing starts at $349 per month cin7.com
Starting price
349 cin7.com
Free plan or trial
Start a free trial cin7.com
Integrations claimed
700 cin7.com
Customers named
HairCoRoyal EssenceTwo Leaves and a BudMeghan FabulousYuvi FoodsEcolife SolutionsAdvance GlobalEarthmoving Warehouse
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications, hosting

What Cin7's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: cin7.com, trust.cin7.com, cin7.com/features/sales. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cin7's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cin7, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cin7 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Cin7 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cin7, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cin7.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.