Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 38 → 41 of 46
Expedia · 1 category · Named, not rankedExpedia for Business
7Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Expedia for Business was named 4 times in Corporate travel managem, where Navan led with 53%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business44 of 49
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market61 of 61
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Expedia for Business for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 61 of 61 | 100% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Navan at 53% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Expedia for Business held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate travel managem · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 59 → 57 of 57
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel managem | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 59 → 61 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Expedia for Business across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Expedia for Business across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Consumer booking sites like Expedia or Booking.com used as a business travel system ... generally lack policy enforcement” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative
“High-Risk Platforms (Proceed with Caution or Avoid) ... Expedia ... Refunds are notoriously slow or withheld for months.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative
“PissedConsumer rates them low (1.6-1.9/5) for refunds and support—avoid for corporate needs” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative
“Moderate-to-high risk – use caution, especially for complex bookings” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Expedia for Business, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Expedia for Business was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Expedia for Business, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Expedia for Business was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Expedia for Business. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Expedia for Business and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
trustpilot.com6
g2.com5
ottotheagent.com5
perk.com4
consumeraffairs.com3
engine.com3
oncehub.com3
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
softwareadvice.com3
uk.trustpilot.com3
Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Expedia for Business came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
expedia.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Expedia for Business takes 0% of first choices and Navan takes 53%.ShowHide
Search and answers
expedia.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Expedia for Business takes 0% of first choices and Navan takes 53%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “travel management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “corporate travel booking platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“expedia for business”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 61 of 61 in corporate travel managem
Segment leader
53%
Navan
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 7 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Expedia for Business
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Expedia for Business; a claim can dispute any of them.
Expedia 4
Follow Expedia for Business
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Expedia for Business's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Expedia for Business, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Expedia for Business by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Expedia for Business is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Expedia for Business, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.