Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 39 → 44 of 46
1 category · RankedCWT
34Judge labels
0First choices
13Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Corporate travel managem for mid-market buyers
Rank 16 of 61 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of CWT →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business47 of 49
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market16 of 61
0%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise12 of 49
0%16 labels
criticized challenger
In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CWT for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 16 of 61 | 18% | 11 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, CWT held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate travel managem · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 22 → 15 of 57
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 12 → 11 of 46
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel managem | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 16 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CWT across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CWT across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Enterprise organizations with complex global programs should evaluate Amex GBT, BCD Travel, or CWT” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Corporate travel managem · comparative prompt · alternative
“Good fit if you want a service-heavy enterprise travel program.” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate travel managem · comparative prompt · alternative
“Need global human support at scale? → Amex GBT / BCD / CWT” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate travel managem · comparative prompt · alternative
“Multi-region enterprises, MICE, large programs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate travel managem · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid: Legacy mega-TMCs (like traditional Amex GBT or CWT)” Kimi K2 · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise platforms (SAP Concur, Egencia, CWT, BCD Travel) — ... potentially more complex and less user-friendly” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate travel managem · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CWT, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CWT was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CWT, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CWT was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CWT. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 34 answers that named CWT and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
navan.com22
ottotheagent.com22
g2.com20
oncehub.com20
engine.com14
itilite.com13
perk.com13
ramp.com13
learn.g2.com12
travel-code.com11
160 of the 160 domain citations in answers naming CWT came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mycwt.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CWT takes 0% of first choices and Navan takes 53%.ShowHide
Search and answers
mycwt.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CWT takes 0% of first choices and Navan takes 53%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “travel management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “corporate travel booking platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 12,100 a month (“cwt”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 979 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 38,806 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 452 · 118 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,529
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 61 in corporate travel managem
Segment leader
53%
Navan
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 34 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 31 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mycwt.com
595
subdomains included
Content
89
counted in the table below
Documentation
105
Product · Integration
3 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 79 | 0 | 2025-09-08 | ||
| Podcast or video | 6 | undated | |||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2022-06-02 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 0 | 2019-01-10 |
Most recent
- 2025-09-08Btn business travel tech talk london blog
- 2025-09-02Amex gbt completes acquisition of cwt blog
- 2025-08-26Thales extends longstanding global partnership with cwt blog
- 2025-08-24Use data science to future proof your travel program blog
- 2025-08-24How to boost your hotel attachment rate blog
- 2025-08-20Csrd and saf towards the same goals blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mycwt.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as CWT
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CWT; a claim can dispute any of them.
CWT (Carlson Wagonlit Travel) 1
Follow CWT
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
CWT is its own company.ShowHide
The company
CWT is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Your business travel, meetings & events partner.
- For
- business travel, meetings and events
- Price stated
- null mycwt.com/legal/platform-terms-of-use
- Starting price
- null mycwt.com/legal/platform-terms-of-use
- Free plan or trial
- null mycwt.com/legal/platform-terms-of-use
- Certifications
- Cyber Essentials Certification
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting, customers
What CWT's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: mycwt.com, mycwt.com/insights/tag/security, mycwt.com/legal/platform-terms-of-use, mycwt.com/insights/category/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CWT's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CWT, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CWT by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CWT is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CWT, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.