Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 27 → 43 of 46
1 category · RankedAmex GBT Egencia
97Judge labels
5First choices
22Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Corporate travel managem for enterprise buyers
Rank 11 of 61 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 23% of its 35 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Amex GBT Egencia →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business46 of 49
0%19 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market11 of 61
0%35 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise3 of 49
10%43 labels
accepted challenger
In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Amex GBT Egencia for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 11 of 61 | 23% | 35 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Amex GBT Egencia held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate travel managem · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 10 → 8 of 57
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 46
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel managem | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 11 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Amex GBT Egencia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Amex GBT Egencia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels1
Paraphrase12 labels1
Comparative28 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels3
Scale-constrained15 labelsNone
Negative17 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative97 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Egencia pricing is custom — typically for organizations of 500+ employees or with substantial annual travel volume.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Corporate travel managem · scale prompt · alternative
“Choose Egencia if you want a travel program with strong support and a familiar corporate travel workflow.” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate travel managem · comparative prompt · alternative
“Another solid choice for SMBs, especially those wanting enterprise-level capabilities without the enterprise cost” Mistral Small · Corporate travel managem · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for Strict Risk Management & Global Scale: Egencia by Amex GBT ... is a highly reliable option” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate travel managem · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"Egencia is the WORST business travel booking system on the market."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative
“This platform has been mentioned in the context of some concerns... there might be some watch-outs to consider.” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative
“generally strong for enterprise travel, but you still want to check support responsiveness and policy fit” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative
“Users report legacy technology that lags behind modern platforms like Navan or Perk, with weaker UX” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate travel managem · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Amex GBT Egencia, over the 97 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Amex GBT Egencia was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Amex GBT Egencia, over the 97 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Amex GBT Egencia was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Amex GBT Egencia. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 90 of the 97 answers that named Amex GBT Egencia and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
navan.com64
ottotheagent.com58
g2.com47
perk.com41
ramp.com40
learn.g2.com37
oncehub.com36
engine.com31
bill.com28
itilite.com25
407 of the 407 domain citations in answers naming Amex GBT Egencia came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
egencia.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Amex GBT Egencia takes 0% of first choices and Navan takes 53%.ShowHide
Search and answers
egencia.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Amex GBT Egencia takes 0% of first choices and Navan takes 53%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “travel management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “corporate travel booking platform”
1
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“amex gbt egencia”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 16,426 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 262 · 72 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,021
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 11 of 61 in corporate travel managem
Segment leader
53%
Navan
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 97 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 90 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Amex GBT Egencia
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Amex GBT Egencia; a claim can dispute any of them.
Egencia 17Egencia by Amex GBT 6Egencia (Amex GBT) 3Egencia (by Amex GBT) 2Amex GBT/Egencia 1Egencia (now part of Amex GBT) 1Egencia/Amex GBT 1
Follow Amex GBT Egencia
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Amex GBT Egencia is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Amex GBT Egencia is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Your shortcut to synchronized business travel and expense.
- For
- digitally-forward companies of all sizes; from small start-ups and mid-sized businesses to global enterprises and multinational corporations
- Integrations claimed
- 50 egencia.com/public/us
- Customers named
- RicohExpedia Group
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting
What Amex GBT Egencia's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: egencia.com/public/us, egencia.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Amex GBT Egencia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Amex GBT Egencia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Amex GBT Egencia by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Amex GBT Egencia is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Amex GBT Egencia, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.