Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 71 → 25 of 96
2 categories · Named, not rankedFlow ERP
8Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Flow ERP was named 2 times in Financial consolidation and 1 other category, where Prophix led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business26 of 100
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market76 of 102
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise20 of 82
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In financial consolidation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Flow ERP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 76 of 102 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | goneNot named this edition; 2% in September 2026. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 48 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Flow ERP held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial consolidation · by segment
Mid-marketgoneNot named this edition; 2% in September 2026.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsNot ranked
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 24 → 19 of 75
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 76 of 102 |
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 48 of 105, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Flow ERP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Flow ERP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Flow ERP is an AI-native ERP built specifically for multi-entity mid-market businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Financial reporting · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Flow ERP, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Flow ERP was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Flow ERP, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Flow ERP was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Flow ERP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Flow ERP and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
liveflow.comYour site6
consolidate.io4
erpresearch.com4
fueler.io4
maxima.ai4
prophix.com4
bluecopa.com3
fathomhq.com3
fuelfinance.me3
getaleph.com3
Thirty-two of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Flow ERP came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
liveflow.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Flow ERP takes 0% of first choices and Prophix takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
liveflow.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Flow ERP takes 0% of first choices and Prophix takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “consolidation tools”
4
Position for “financial consolidation software”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 94,846 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 24,585 · 976 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 766
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 76 of 102 in financial consolidation
Segment leader
24%
Prophix
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 8 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on liveflow.com
1,497
subdomains included
Content
583
counted in the table below
Documentation
208
Product · Integration
9 · 24
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 267 | 96 | 2026-09-29 | Financial consolidation | |
| Blog | 214 | 16 | 2026-09-29 | Accounting software, Financial consolidation | |
| Comparison | 60 | 35 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 24 | 15 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Case study | 14 | 11 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 3 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2026-03-25 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Template category google sheet blog
- 2026-09-29Template category microsoft excel blog
- 2026-09-29Google sheets web app link blog
- 2026-09-29Excel web app link blog
- 2026-09-29Liveflow vs jirav comparison
- 2026-09-29Liveflow vs datarails comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page liveflow.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name accounting software (10); 6 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Flow ERP
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Flow ERP is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Flow ERP is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- An AI-native ERP built for multi-entity finance and physical businesses
- For
- growing, multi-entity businesses
- Price stated
- Pricing is tailored to what you need liveflow.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2GDPR
- Customers named
- Y CombinatorOpenPhoneKalshiSlashCleoRize EducationETS PerformanceLupus Research Alliance
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Flow ERP's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: liveflow.com, liveflow.com/pricing, trust.liveflow.com, liveflow.com/features/payables, liveflow.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Flow ERP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Flow ERP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Flow ERP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Flow ERP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Flow ERP, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.