Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 59 of 82, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedJ.P. Morgan
7Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. J.P. Morgan was named 1 time in Cross-border payments, where Wise Business led with 39%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market62 of 87
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise30 of 96
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In cross-border payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named J.P. Morgan for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-border payments and FX | Treasury and cash | 0% | 62 of 87 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 39% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, J.P. Morgan held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Cross-border payments · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 35 → 26 of 82
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-border payments | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 87, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated J.P. Morgan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated J.P. Morgan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“traditional bank solutions like JP Morgan/HSBC ... Traditional banks often add 3%+ implicitly via bad rates.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cross-border payments · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as J.P. Morgan, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and J.P. Morgan was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as J.P. Morgan, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and J.P. Morgan was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named J.P. Morgan. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 7 answers that named J.P. Morgan and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
resolvepay.com2
softwaresuggest.com2
wise.com2
airwallex.com1
chargeflow.io1
connectpay.com1
dashdevs.com1
docs.wise.com1
emergenresearch.com1
fitsmallbusiness.com1
Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming J.P. Morgan came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
jpmorgan.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, J.P. Morgan takes 0% of first choices and Wise Business takes 39%.ShowHide
Search and answers
jpmorgan.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, J.P. Morgan takes 0% of first choices and Wise Business takes 39%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “cross-border payment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cross-border payments platform for businesses”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 301,000 a month (“j.p. morgan”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 12,219 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 5,773,129 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 116,123 · 20,541 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 63,535
- Paid Google search
- 84 searches its ads show for, about 1,612 clicks and $27,414 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 62 of 87 in cross-border payments
Segment leader
39%
Wise Business
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 7 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 4 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on jpmorgan.com
4,892
subdomains included
Content
2,016
counted in the table below
Documentation
5
Product · Integration
108 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,527 | undated | Treasury management syst, Cash flow forecasting | ||
| Podcast or video | 200 | 4 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| News or press | 185 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 28 | 0 | 2026-01-20 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 28 | 0 | 2023-01-31 | ||
| Comparison | 24 | 2 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Template or tool | 11 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 6 | undated | |||
| Case study | 5 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Why tokenization is gaining momentum podcast or video
- 2026-08-28The capital required for critical supply chains podcast or video
- 2026-08-21The new defense playbook partnerships capital capability podcast or video
- 2026-08-11Cpi inflation funflation imax podcast or video
- 2026-08-04Geopolitics vs markets how might the us china and iran reshape global risk comparison
- 2026-07-28Momentum vs fundamentals in the ai trade insights from blackrock comparison
Events in person
Upcoming
- January 11, 2027 to January 14, 202745th Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare ConferenceSan Francisco · hosts
Last twelve months
- September 21, 2026 to September 22, 2026Discover J.P. Morgan's India ConferenceMumbai, India · hosted
- reported August 20262026 Asia Pacific Macro ConferenceSingapore, Singapore · hosted
As the event pages on jpmorgan.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page jpmorgan.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as J.P. Morgan
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as J.P. Morgan; a claim can dispute any of them.
JP Morgan 1
Follow J.P. Morgan
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
J.P. Morgan is its own company.ShowHide
The company
J.P. Morgan is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Official Website
- For
- corporations and individuals
- Hosting
- Global
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, customers
What J.P. Morgan's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: jpmorgan.com, jpmorgan.com/solutions/usopen. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when J.P. Morgan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as J.P. Morgan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for J.P. Morgan by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where J.P. Morgan is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name J.P. Morgan, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.