Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 41 of 63, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedLedge
23Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ledge was named 8 times in AI accounting assistants and 1 other category, where Sage Intacct led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business44 of 67
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 85
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise30 of 100
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In ai accounting assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Ledge for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 2% | 18 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 22% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 0% | 27 of 83 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Ledge held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · AI accounting assistants · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
3%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 9 → 18 of 72
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 25 of 87, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI accounting assistants | 5% | 3% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 18 of 85 |
| Cash application | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 33 → 27 of 83 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Ledge across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Ledge across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase5 labels1
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you want a single agent for month-end close: Implement Ledge. It solves the most time-consuming B2B accounting pain point” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI accounting assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Prioritize modern, AI-driven platforms (like Ledge, BlackLine, or HighRadius)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash application · negative prompt · alternative
“Fast deployment (weeks, not months) | Stuut, Quadient, or Ledge” Kimi K2 · Cash application · negative prompt · alternative
“SMB | Ledge, OpenEnvoy, or similar AI-native lighter-weight tools” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash application · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ledge, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ledge was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ledge, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ledge was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ledge. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named Ledge and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ledge.coYour site18
bluecopa.com13
highradius.com12
stuut.ai10
chaserhq.com8
itechguides.com7
kolleno.com7
thecfoclub.com7
lunos.ai6
upflow.io6
Seventy-six of the ninety-four domain citations in answers naming Ledge came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
ledge.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Ledge takes 2% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
ledge.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Ledge takes 2% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ai accounting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ai bookkeeping tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 18,100 a month (“ledge”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 7,714 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,897 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 530 · 69 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 608
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 18 of 85 in AI accounting assistants
Segment leader
22%
Sage Intacct
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 23 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 23 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on ledge.co
315
subdomains included
Content
27
counted in the table below
Documentation
85
Product · Integration
24 · 74
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | 11 | 0 | 2026-05-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 0 | 2025-01-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 1 | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Blog | 3 | undated | |||
| Case study | 1 | 0 | 2023-12-11 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-17Checklist review ai accounting work template or tool
- 2026-06-25Close checklist template or tool
- 2026-05-25Faq ledge vs anthropic month end closer whats the difference comparison
- 2026-04-06Blackline vs numeric vs ledge what 100 finance leaders say comparison
- 2026-04-06Chatgpt claude and gemini vs ledge for close automation comparison
- 2026-02-16Ledge vs numeric comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page ledge.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Ledge
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Ledge is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Ledge is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Close Management with AI Agents
- For
- finance teams working at scale
- Price stated
- Ledge uses one SaaS fee tailored to your close scope, not per-user pricing. ledge.co/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 150 ledge.co · 6 ledge.co/solutions/flux-analysis pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 1SOC 2
- Customers named
- Papaya GlobalAmplaFayeHome365
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Ledge's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ledge.co, ledge.co/pricing, trust.ledge.co, ledge.co/solutions/flux-analysis, ledge.co/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ledge's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ledge, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ledge by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Ledge is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ledge, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.