AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Lockstep · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Lockstep

5Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lockstep was named 3 times in Accounts receivable auto and 1 other category, where Upflow led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In accounts receivable auto · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Lockstep for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Accounts receivable automationReceivables and billing0%75 of 7950%2under 10 labels · led by Upflow at 17%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Cash applicationReceivables and billing0%58 of 830%1under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Lockstep held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Accounts receivable auto · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 34 → 36 of 57
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 13 → 71 of 75
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Accounts receivable auto2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 13 → 75 of 79
Cash application0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 58 of 83, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Lockstep across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500112
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Lockstep users report slow browser times and lack of documentation can make some processes difficult” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Accounts receivable auto · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lockstep, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lockstep was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Versapay5 of 50Not among the top eight
HighRadius3 of 51Not among the top eight
BILL Accounts Receivable2 of 50Not among the top eight
BillerGenie2 of 50Not among the top eight
Billtrust2 of 50Not among the top eight
BlackLine Cash Application2 of 50Not among the top eight
Upflow1 of 51Not among the top eight
BILL1 of 50Not among the top eight
Bluecopa1 of 50Not among the top eight
Centime1 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lockstep. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 5 answers that named Lockstep and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ebizcharge.com3
bluecopa.com2
emagia.com2
upflow.io2
auxis.com1
b2breviews.com1
billtrust.com1
bluevine.com1
centime.com1
chargezoom.com1

Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Lockstep came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on lockstep.io
4,402
subdomains included
Content
320
counted in the table below
Documentation
7
Product · Integration
317 · 3
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Report or ebook104undatedPSA, Accounting software
Blog67undatedLease accounting, Revenue recognition
Case study53undated
News or press4302026-06-01
Comparison28undated
Webinar or virtual event22undated
Conference or event202025-02-01
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page lockstep.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Lockstep

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lockstep's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lockstep, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lockstep by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Lockstep is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lockstep, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lockstep.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.