| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounts payable automation | Spend and procurement | 22% | 2 of 54 | 5% | 42 | accepted challenger | ▲+1Since September 2026: 19% → 20%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 2% | 6 of 98 | 0% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 2% | 11 of 87 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 42% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 0% | 29 of 85 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 0% | 27 of 71 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounting software | Accounting and close | 0% | 38 of 55 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 44% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 60 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 108 of 136 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | |
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 0% | 100 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business bill pay | 5% | 2% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 of 98, unchanged |
| Accounts payable automat | 19% | 20% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 19% → 20%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 → 2 of 54 |
| Procure-to-pay | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 11 of 87 |
| AI accounting assistants | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 68 → 29 of 85 |
| Invoicing software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 27 of 71 |
| Accounting software | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 38 of 55, unchanged |
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 60 of 94, unchanged |
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 108 of 136, unchanged |
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 100 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 11 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Stampli: Best for collaborative AP, highly complex routing, handling manual exceptions, and companies with highly customized ERP structures.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounts payable automat · scale prompt · first choice
“If I had to pick one default recommendation without more context, it would be Stampli for a mid-sized B2B company” GPT-5.4 mini · Accounts payable automat · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Stampli and Tipalti emerge as top contenders, with Stampli excelling in collaboration and ERP integration” MiniMax M2.5 · Accounts payable automat · direct prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for ERP Integration & Approval Workflows: Stampli ... widely considered the best-in-class option” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business bill pay · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Thin review base on some platforms (85 G2 reviews vs. 1,978 for competitors)—harder to validate claims” Kimi K2 · Accounts payable automat · negative prompt · soft negative
“Slow approvals/processing, vendor edit challenges” Grok 4.1 Fast · Accounts payable automat · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 157 of the 159 answers that named Stampli and are not a share of its labels.
518 of the 576 domain citations in answers naming Stampli came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 954 | 10 | 2026-09-09 | Procure-to-pay, Expense management | |
| Comparison | 100 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | Corporate cards, Cash application | |
| Podcast or video | 40 | 0 | 2023-02-23 | ||
| Case study | 28 | 3 | 2026-09-10 | Accounts payable automat | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 26 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | ||
| News or press | 16 | 0 | 2026-06-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | Procure-to-pay, Corporate cards | |
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2026-06-26 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on stampli.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page stampli.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Stampli's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: stampli.com, stampli.com/pricing, stampli.com/case-studies, stampli.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Stampli's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Stampli, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Stampli by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Stampli is among the products AI models recommend first in Accounts payable automation this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.