Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 54 → 48 of 50
Microsoft Dynamics GP
10Judge labels
0First choices
10Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Microsoft Dynamics GP was named 5 times in Accounting software and 2 other categories, where Sage Intacct led with 44%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market52 of 55
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In accounting software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Microsoft Dynamics GP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounting software | Accounting and close | 0% | 52 of 55 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 44% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 0% | 70 of 73 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Oracle NetSuite at 39% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 0% | 63 of 77 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Microsoft Dynamics GP held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Accounting software · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounting software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 54 → 52 of 55 |
| ERP systems | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 42 → 70 of 73 |
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 63 of 77, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Microsoft Dynamics GP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Microsoft Dynamics GP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Microsoft is phasing out Dynamics GP ... Continued use exposes businesses to security risks” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounting software · negative prompt · hard negative
“do not buy these platforms... Microsoft has set a firm sunset timeline.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ERP systems · negative prompt · hard negative
“Caution with: SAP ECC (non-Hana), Oracle E-Business Suite, Microsoft Dynamics GP.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Revenue recognition · negative prompt · soft negative
“Treat it as a short-horizon choice, not a long-term greenfield platform.” GPT-6 Luna · ERP systems · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Dynamics GP, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Dynamics GP was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Dynamics GP, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Dynamics GP was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Dynamics GP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 10 answers that named Microsoft Dynamics GP and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learn.microsoft.com5
netsuite.com3
reddit.com3
youtube.com3
grandlinux.com2
help.sap.com2
sage.com2
support.sap.com2
accountingdepartment.com1
accountingweb.co.uk1
No domain is on file for Microsoft Dynamics GP, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Microsoft Dynamics GP
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft Dynamics GP; a claim can dispute any of them.
Microsoft Dynamics GP (Great Plains) 1Microsoft Dynamics GP (formerly Great Plains) 1
Follow Microsoft Dynamics GP
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Microsoft Dynamics is the company behind Microsoft Dynamics GP.ShowHide
The company
Microsoft Dynamics is the company behind Microsoft Dynamics GP.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIs this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Dynamics GP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Dynamics GP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Dynamics GP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Microsoft Dynamics GP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Dynamics GP, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.