Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 86 of 89, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedMint
6Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mint was named 6 times in Business bill pay and 1 other category, where BILL led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market94 of 98
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In business bill pay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Mint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 0% | 94 of 98 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by BILL at 32% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Expense management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 54 of 54 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 35% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Mint held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Business bill pay · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business bill pay | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 94 of 98, unchanged |
| Expense management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 54 of 54 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Mint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Mint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid remnants of Mint (shut down in 2024 by Intuit; migrated to Credit Karma, which users call a downgrade” Grok 4.1 Fast · Expense management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Mint discontinued its bill pay feature; now focuses on budgeting” Kimi K2 · Business bill pay · comparative prompt · hard negative
“apps like Prism and Mint permanently shut down” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business bill pay · comparative prompt · hard negative
“Mint was shut down in 2024 by Intuit, leaving users' financial histories inaccessible” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Expense management · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mint, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mint was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mint, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mint was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Mint and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
play.google.com4
budgetvault.app3
doxo.com3
g2.com3
softwareadvice.com3
trustpilot.com3
airwallex.com2
bbb.org2
bill.com2
capterra.com2
Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Mint came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mintline.ai
203
subdomains included
Content
173
counted in the table below
Documentation
7
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 156 | 0 | 2026-05-04 | Accounts payable automat, Procure-to-pay | |
| Comparison | 8 | 0 | 2026-03-13 | ||
| Report or ebook | 5 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2026-02-21 |
Most recent
- 2026-05-04Business case excel template blog
- 2026-05-03Date format in google sheet blog
- 2026-05-02Card visa virtual blog
- 2026-05-01Bill in excel format blog
- 2026-04-30Pdf a ocr blog
- 2026-04-29Define situational analysis blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mintline.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Mint
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mint; a claim can dispute any of them.
Mint (Intuit) 1Mint (now Credit Karma) 1Mint / Intuit 1
Follow Mint
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Mint is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Mint is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered bank statement and receipt matching software for small businesses and finance teams.
- For
- Freelancers, small business owners, startup founders, small teams, companies
- Price stated
- Free plan; Pro €29/month; Team €99/month mintline.ai
- Starting price
- 0 mintline.ai
- Free plan or trial
- 50 matches/month. No credit card required. mintline.ai
- Certifications
- ADA CASA Tier 2 VerifiedSOC 2 Type II certified
- Hosting
- European UnionEuropean Union data centers
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, customers
What Mint's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: mintline.ai, mintline.ai/pricing, mintline.ai/docs/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mint by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Mint is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mint, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.