| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 0% | 47 of 98 | 33% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by BILL at 32% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 88 of 94 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business bill pay | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 53 → 47 of 98 |
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 84 → 88 of 94 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Allows you to pay almost any bill with a credit card... but Plastiq charges a fee (typically around 2.85%)” Mistral Small · Business bill pay · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Businesses needing to pay bills via credit/debit cards” MiniMax M2.5 · Business bill pay · comparative prompt · alternative
“Need to pay with credit cards → Plastiq” Kimi K2 · Business bill pay · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in May 2023 ... Failed after Silicon Valley Bank collapse disrupted their banking partner arrangements” MiniMax M2.5 · B2B payment acceptance · negative prompt · hard negative
“Credit-Card-to-Check Services (e.g., Plastiq) The Risk: High transaction fees, late/lost payments, and poor customer service.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business bill pay · negative prompt · hard negative
“Fees increased from 2.5% to 2.85% (and now 2.9%)... Poor customer service reviews” Kimi K2 · Business bill pay · negative prompt · soft negative
“Plastiq — Caution (Fees & Customer Service)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Business bill pay · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Plastiq and are not a share of its labels.
Fifty-eight of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming Plastiq came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 174 | 0 | 2026-03-04 | ||
| News or press | 17 | undated | |||
| Case study | 9 | 0 | 2023-02-09 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2019-02-08 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2018-05-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2026-01-28 |
Every page plastiq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Plastiq's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: plastiq.com, plastiq.com/pricing, plastiq.com/security, plastiq.com/products/pay. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Plastiq's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Plastiq, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Plastiq by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: