Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 21 → 8 of 61
3 categories · RankedOrder.co
28Judge labels
2First choices
3Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Procure-to-pay for small business buyers
Rank 29 of 87 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 69
2%13 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market29 of 87
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise44 of 52
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In procure-to-pay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Order.co for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 29 of 87 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 42% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B BNPL and net terms | Receivables and billing | 0% | 58 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Resolve Pay at 56% | |
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 0% | 89 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Order.co held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Procure-to-pay · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 19 → 27 of 79
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 27 → 32 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procure-to-pay | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 29 of 87 |
| B2B BNPL and terms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 58 of 90, unchanged |
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 89 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Order.co across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Order.co across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Order.co: Best for Multi-Location Physical Goods and Consolidated Billing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Procure-to-pay · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Simplified physical-goods purchasing and payment consolidation.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Procure-to-pay · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“may provide less depth in finance controls and real-time budget visibility” Perplexity Sonar · Procure-to-pay · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Order.co, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Order.co was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Order.co, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Order.co was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Order.co. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 28 answers that named Order.co and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
order.coYour site16
ramp.com14
learn.g2.com11
g2.com10
precoro.com10
procuredesk.com9
payhawk.com8
tradogram.com8
rippling.com7
capterra.com6
Eighty-three of the ninety-nine domain citations in answers naming Order.co came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
order.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Order.co takes 0% of first choices and Procurify takes 42%.ShowHide
Search and answers
order.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Order.co takes 0% of first choices and Procurify takes 42%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “procurement platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “procure-to-pay platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“order.co”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 7 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 64,386 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,679 · 327 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,746
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 23 clicks and $369 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 29 of 87 in procure-to-pay
Segment leader
42%
Procurify
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 28 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 28 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on order.co
526
subdomains included
Content
475
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 354 | 16 | 2026-09-09 | Procure-to-pay | |
| Case study | 50 | 3 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Comparison | 39 | 1 | 2026-07-30 | Expense management | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 0 | 2025-12-23 | Strategic sourcing | |
| News or press | 9 | 1 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2026-02-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Workday purchasing copilot news or press
- 2026-09-14Ninja kidz action parks case study
- 2026-09-09Senior living supply spend blog
- 2026-09-03Track construction job site spend blog
- 2026-09-01Procurement software rfp questions blog
- 2026-08-25Procurement software urgent care blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page order.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Order.co
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Order.co is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Order.co is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Modernize your procure-to-pay process with Order.co. Automate purchasing & payments to help your business save time, save money, and gain clarity.
- For
- business
- Customers named
- WeWorkcorepowerNY Preschool & Kids ClubCozen O’ConnorEPIC4AvantStayNinja Kidz Action ParksMighty Pilates
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Order.co's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: order.co, trust.order.co, order.co/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Order.co's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Order.co, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Order.co by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Order.co is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Order.co, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.