Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 7 of 61, unchanged
4 categories · RankedProcureDesk
57Judge labels
2First choices
3Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Procure-to-pay for mid-market buyers
Rank 8 of 87 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ProcureDesk →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 69
2%24 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market8 of 87
2%16 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise33 of 52
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In procure-to-pay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ProcureDesk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 2% | 8 of 87 | 0% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 33 of 111 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Spend management platforms | Spend and procurement | 0% | 34 of 46 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 44% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 0% | 93 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ProcureDesk held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Procure-to-pay · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 5 → 8 of 79
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procure-to-pay | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 8 of 87 |
| Supplier management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 33 of 111 |
| Spend management platfor | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 34 of 46, unchanged |
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 59 → 93 of 128 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ProcureDesk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ProcureDesk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase12 labels1
Comparative14 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labels1
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The sweet spot for your 500-person company is solutions like ProcureDesk, Procurify, or Coupa that scale appropriately for your size.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Procure-to-pay · scale prompt · first choice
“Offers a procure-to-pay suite that combines procurement, invoicing, supply chain optimization, expense management, and payments” Llama 4 Maverick · Procure-to-pay · direct prompt · alternative
“If you need something a bit more capable but still budget-conscious, ProcureDesk is worth considering” GPT-5.4 mini · Supplier management · budget prompt · alternative
“If you need mobile‑first, field‑friendly P2P with quick deployment: ProcureDesk.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Procure-to-pay · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ProcureDesk, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProcureDesk was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ProcureDesk, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProcureDesk was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ProcureDesk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 57 answers that named ProcureDesk and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
procuredesk.comYour site42
spendflo.com31
g2.com29
ramp.com25
tradogram.com24
learn.g2.com21
mindsprint.com21
softwareconnect.com21
softwareadvice.com20
precoro.com18
210 of the 252 domain citations in answers naming ProcureDesk came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
procuredesk.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ProcureDesk takes 2% of first choices and Procurify takes 42%.ShowHide
Search and answers
procuredesk.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ProcureDesk takes 2% of first choices and Procurify takes 42%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “procurement platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “procure-to-pay platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“procuredesk”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 11,677 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,852 · 196 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,069
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 87 in procure-to-pay
Segment leader
42%
Procurify
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 57 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 57 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on procuredesk.com
1,117
subdomains included
Content
329
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
58 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 149 | 21 | 2026-09-13 | Procure-to-pay, Accounts payable automat | |
| Glossary or explainer | 102 | 9 | 2026-09-05 | Supplier management, Expense management | |
| Comparison | 48 | 11 | 2026-09-21 | Corporate cards, Procure-to-pay | |
| Case study | 17 | 1 | 2026-09-09 | Accounts payable automat | |
| Template or tool | 11 | 1 | 2026-08-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 1 | 2026-08-17 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Procuredesk vs yardi procure to pay comparison
- 2026-09-17Yardi payscan alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-13Procuredesk sage intacct integration blog
- 2026-09-09Aeon case study
- 2026-09-05Clinical trial procurement glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-05Cold chain logistics glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page procuredesk.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow ProcureDesk
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ProcureDesk is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ProcureDesk is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Procurement and AP automation software built for finance
- For
- finance teams and controllers in mid-market companies
- Price stated
- $598.00 procuredesk.com
- Starting price
- 598.00 procuredesk.com
- Free plan or trial
- 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee procuredesk.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 7 procuredesk.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 CertifiedAICPA SOC 2 compliance badgeSOC 2 compliantSOC 2 Type II certifiedSOC2 protectionSOC 2SOC2
- Customers named
- MetabolonChattahoochee Hills Charter SchoolFunai LexingtonGerloff ConstructionmyDNACoast FlightElhogarEvolveImmune Therapeutics
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What ProcureDesk's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: procuredesk.com, procuredesk.com/pricing, procuredesk.com/security, procuredesk.com/product, procuredesk.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ProcureDesk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ProcureDesk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ProcureDesk by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ProcureDesk is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ProcureDesk, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.