Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 29 of 61, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedPerk
2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Perk was named 1 time in Accounts payable automat, where Ramp led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business30 of 63
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market33 of 54
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In accounts payable automat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Perk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounts payable automation | Spend and procurement | 0% | 33 of 54 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 22% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Perk held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Accounts payable automat · by segment
Mid-marketgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounts payable automat | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 33 of 54, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Perk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Perk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Perk is the strongest choice for mid-market businesses wanting unified AP and spend management” Muse Glimmer 30B · Accounts payable automat · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Perk, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Perk was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Perk, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Perk was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Perk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Perk and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
bill.com2
blog.alguna.com2
perk.comYour site2
ramp.com2
salesforce.com2
chaserhq.com1
credit-iq.com1
docsumo.com1
forwardly.com1
g2.com1
Thirteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Perk came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
perk.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Perk takes 0% of first choices and Ramp takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
perk.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Perk takes 0% of first choices and Ramp takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ap automation tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “accounts payable automation software”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 37,067 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,029 · 149 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,353
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 33 of 54 in accounts payable automat
Segment leader
22%
Ramp
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 2 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 2 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on perk.com
4,067
subdomains included
Content
1,596
counted in the table below
Documentation
111
Product · Integration
3 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 822 | 18 | 2026-09-28 | Expense management, Corporate cards | |
| Case study | 224 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 220 | undated | Expense management, Corporate travel managem | ||
| News or press | 141 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 94 | 2 | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Comparison | 65 | 0 | 2026-01-14 | Corporate cards | |
| Glossary or explainer | 24 | 0 | 2025-08-14 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28How to reduce maverick spend blog
- 2026-09-28How to improve expense policy compliance without impacting efficiency blog
- 2026-09-21Reclaim european vat on business trips blog
- 2026-09-17Best practices for an expense reimbursement policy blog
- 2026-09-15Perk Spend Is Now Available in the US blog
- 2026-09-15Why connected travel and spend needs more than an integration blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page perk.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name expense management (31); 5 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Perk
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Perk is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Perk is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The intelligent platform for travel and spend.
- For
- businesses worldwide
- Price stated
- Contact Perk for pricing. Starter, Premium and Pro plans available. perk.com
- Starting price
- $0 /month perk.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Starter; No platform fee; $0 /month perk.com/pricing
- Certifications
- ISO 27001SOC Type 2cyber essentialsAWS is ISO 27001 and SOC2 certifiedGDPRSwiss Data Protection ActISO 9001PCI-DSS
- Hosting
- Ireland
- Customers named
- FableticsOn RunningStoryblokLushNord SecurityBitpandaUMBOn
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Perk's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: perk.com, perk.com/pricing, perk.com/security, perk.com/platform, perk.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Perk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Perk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Perk by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Perk is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Perk, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.