Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 23 → 22 of 111
2 categories · Named, not rankedPipefy
10Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Pipefy was named 3 times in Supplier management and 1 other category, where Precoro led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business26 of 117
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 111
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In supplier management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Pipefy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 2% | 18 of 111 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 60 of 87 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 42% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Pipefy held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Supplier management · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 60 → 21 of 107
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procure-to-pay | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 60 of 87 |
| Supplier management | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 60 → 18 of 111 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Pipefy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Pipefy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with free options like Pipefy or Tradogram's free tier” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Supplier management · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pipefy, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pipefy was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pipefy, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pipefy was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pipefy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Pipefy and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ramp.com7
g2.com5
mindsprint.com5
tradogram.com5
precoro.com4
softwareconnect.com4
suppliergateway.com4
infraspeak.com3
procurify.com3
theretailexec.com3
Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Pipefy came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
pipefy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pipefy takes 2% of first choices and Precoro takes 14%.ShowHide
Search and answers
pipefy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pipefy takes 2% of first choices and Precoro takes 14%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “supplier management software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “supplier management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“pipefy”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 28 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 35,566 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,615 · 227 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,519
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 18 of 111 in supplier management
Segment leader
14%
Precoro
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 10 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on pipefy.com
8,974
subdomains included
Content
2,069
counted in the table below
Documentation
4,028
Product · Integration
26 · 1
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 677 | 13 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| News or press | 453 | 6 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 428 | 0 | 2026-05-29 | ||
| Case study | 119 | 3 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 115 | 3 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Conference or event | 98 | 0 | 2026-02-24 | ||
| Comparison | 81 | 1 | 2026-08-13 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 69 | 0 | 2025-11-27 | ||
| Report or ebook | 27 | 0 | 2026-04-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2024-07-22 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Algar case study
- 2026-09-24Sobhan daliry cpo ai strategy leader at pipefy interview series news or press
- 2026-09-21Agentic ai for enterprise blog
- 2026-09-16Legacy system integration without downtime blog
- 2026-09-14It modernization roadmap legacy systems blog
- 2026-09-10Pipefy launches ai agent gallery with ready to deploy agents for hr news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pipefy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Pipefy
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Pipefy is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Pipefy is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Agents for Workflow Automation
- For
- companies
- Price stated
- Free; Contact Sales pipefy.com/pricing
- Starting price
- Free pipefy.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try for free pipefy.com
- Integrations claimed
- 500 pipefy.com/pricing
- Certifications
- recognized by Gartner® for its no-code agent builder capabilitiesgovernance certifications
- Hosting
- USA
- Customers named
- AccentureSamsoniteBloomin BrandsMantiqueiraInfina Financial ServicesLoftEvoluServicesPuma
What Pipefy's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: pipefy.com, pipefy.com/pricing, pipefy.com/security, pipefy.com/platform, pipefy.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pipefy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pipefy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pipefy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Pipefy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pipefy, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.