Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 6 → 20 of 111
Kissflow · 2 categories · RankedKissflow Procurement
37Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Supplier management for small business buyers
Rank 15 of 111 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business22 of 117
0%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market15 of 111
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise53 of 97
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In supplier management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Kissflow Procurement for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 2% | 15 of 111 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 20 of 87 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 42% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Kissflow Procurement held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Supplier management · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 71 → 15 of 107
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier management | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 71 → 15 of 111 |
| Procure-to-pay | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 48 → 20 of 87 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Kissflow Procurement across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Kissflow Procurement across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labels1
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best Overall: Kissflow stands out for its user-friendly interface and scalability” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Supplier management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Offers structured supplier onboarding steps with approvals and clear document workflow without heavyweight services.” Llama 4 Maverick · Supplier management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“intuitive and cost-effective solution for small businesses to manage their vendors and procurement processes” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Supplier management · budget prompt · alternative
“For teams needing low-code workflow customization: Kissflow Procurement Cloud.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Procure-to-pay · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Kissflow Procurement, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kissflow Procurement was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Kissflow Procurement, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kissflow Procurement was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kissflow Procurement. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 37 answers that named Kissflow Procurement and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ramp.com20
spendflo.com20
procuredesk.com18
wise.com15
g2.com14
mindsprint.com11
softwareadvice.com11
financesonline.com10
softwareconnect.com9
tradogram.com7
135 of the 135 domain citations in answers naming Kissflow Procurement came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
kissflow.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Kissflow Procurement takes 2% of first choices and Precoro takes 14%.ShowHide
Search and answers
kissflow.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Kissflow Procurement takes 2% of first choices and Precoro takes 14%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “supplier management software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “supplier management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“kissflow procurement”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Its company's site
- kissflow.com shared with Kissflow's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 36,586 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 11,699 · 386 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,952
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 15 of 111 in supplier management
Segment leader
14%
Precoro
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 37 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 32 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Kissflow Procurement
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Kissflow Procurement; a claim can dispute any of them.
Kissflow Procurement Cloud 6Kissflow 4
Follow Kissflow Procurement
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Kissflow is the company behind Kissflow Procurement.ShowHide
The company
Kissflow is the company behind Kissflow Procurement.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Clear IT backlogs with our low-code platform.
- For
- CIO/IT Leaders; CDO/Transformation Leaders
- Price stated
- Pricing starts at $2,500 /month kissflow.com/kissflow-redefined
- Starting price
- 2500 kissflow.com/kissflow-redefined
- Customers named
- FPHRoyal Exchange General InsuranceSoftBankRamcoMazarineWorld Vision
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Kissflow Procurement's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: kissflow.com/why-kissflow, kissflow.com/kissflow-redefined, kissflow.com/kissflow-app-survey, kissflow.com/kissflow-platform-for-enterprise, kissflow.com/videos/what-is-kissflow. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kissflow Procurement's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kissflow Procurement, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kissflow Procurement by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Kissflow Procurement is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Kissflow Procurement, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.