| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 2% | 15 of 85 | 15% | 13 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 2% | 14 of 77 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI accounting assistants | 0% | 3% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 15 of 85 |
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 43 → 14 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“or Puzzle Starter at $25–30/month (if you want integrated accounting + revenue recognition) offer the best value.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · first choice
“Tier 1: The Best AI-Native Tool for Startups ... Puzzle was built with AI at its core” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI accounting assistants · budget prompt · first choice
“Best startup-focused option: Puzzle, which is described as the "best overall" for subscription businesses” Perplexity Sonar · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · alternative
“Puzzle is a modern, AI-powered accounting platform built specifically for startups.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms like Digits and Puzzle work best on clean, standardized data and require significant manual handling for edge cases” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI accounting assistants · negative prompt · soft negative
“lightweight, all-in-one AI ledger platforms (like Puzzle, Bench, or basic QuickBooks) are not robust enough” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI accounting assistants · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 37 of the 37 answers that named Puzzle and are not a share of its labels.
Ninety-nine of the 112 domain citations in answers naming Puzzle came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 249 | undated | Accounting software, Revenue recognition | ||
| Comparison | 30 | undated | Accounting software, Expense management | ||
| Case study | 23 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | 2 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | undated | Accounting software | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-22 |
Every page puzzle.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name accounting software (30); 4 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Puzzle's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: puzzle.io, puzzle.io/pricing, trust.puzzle.io, puzzle.io/solutions/startup, puzzle.io/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Puzzle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Puzzle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Puzzle by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: